Ad is loading...
CIISX vs SBHSX
CIISX vs SBHSX Comparison
Open Charts CIISX vs SBHSX
Causeway International Small Cap Instl
Price$13.56
Change-$0.29 (-2.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets250.88M
Segall Bryant & Hamill Intl Sm Cp Ret
Price$11.34
Change-$0.18 (-1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.8M
CIISX vs SBHSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIISX vs. SBHSX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIISX is a Hold and SBHSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIISX has more cash in the bank: 251M vs. SBHSX (73.8M). SBHSX pays higher dividends than CIISX: SBHSX (7.72) vs CIISX (5.07). CIISX was incepted earlier than SBHSX: CIISX (10 years) vs SBHSX (11 years). SBHSX (1.63) is less costly to investors than CIISX (1.21). CIISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. SBHSX (106.00). SBHSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIISX: SBHSX (2500) vs CIISX (1000000). SBHSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.83 vs. CIISX (0.16). CIISX return over 5 years is better than : 129.91 vs. SBHSX (105.64).
| CIISX | SBHSX | CIISX / SBHSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.25 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.63 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.593 | 8.413 | 31% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 251M | 73.8M | 340% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.07 | 7.72 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.16 | 11.83 | 1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.24 | 21.58 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 129.91 | 105.64 | 123% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.46 | 41.36 | 195% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...