Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIISX vs SBHSX
CIISX vs SBHSX Comparison
Open Charts CIISX vs SBHSX
Causeway International Small Cap Instl
Price$16.95
Change+$0.04 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets280.81M
Segall Bryant & Hamill Intl Sm Cp Ret
Price$14.33
Change+$0.04 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.24M
CIISX vs SBHSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIISX vs. SBHSX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIISX is a StrongBuy and SBHSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIISX has more cash in the bank: 281M vs. SBHSX (84.2M). SBHSX pays higher dividends than CIISX: SBHSX (6.76) vs CIISX (4.32). CIISX was incepted earlier than SBHSX: CIISX (11 years) vs SBHSX (11 years). SBHSX (1.72) is less costly to investors than CIISX (1.21). CIISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. SBHSX (102.00). SBHSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIISX: SBHSX (2500) vs CIISX (1000000). SBHSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.13 vs. CIISX (16.98). CIISX return over 5 years is better than : 98.94 vs. SBHSX (90.13).
| CIISX | SBHSX | CIISX / SBHSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.21 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.72 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.259 | 35.096 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 281M | 84.2M | 334% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.32 | 6.76 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.98 | 29.13 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.65 | 75.59 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.94 | 90.13 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.95 | 81.93 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement