Ad is loading...
CIISX vs SBHSX
CIISX vs SBHSX Comparison
Open Charts CIISX vs SBHSX
Causeway International Small Cap Instl
Price$14.05
Change+$0.20 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets250.64M
Segall Bryant & Hamill Intl Sm Cp Ret
Price$11.93
Change+$0.17 (+1.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.69M
CIISX vs SBHSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIISX vs. SBHSX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIISX is a StrongBuy and SBHSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIISX has more cash in the bank: 251M vs. SBHSX (75.7M). SBHSX pays higher dividends than CIISX: SBHSX (7.72) vs CIISX (5.07). CIISX was incepted earlier than SBHSX: CIISX (11 years) vs SBHSX (11 years). SBHSX (1.63) is less costly to investors than CIISX (1.21). CIISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. SBHSX (106.00). SBHSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIISX: SBHSX (2500) vs CIISX (1000000). SBHSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.24 vs. CIISX (2.13). CIISX return over 5 years is better than : 108.17 vs. SBHSX (88.35).
| CIISX | SBHSX | CIISX / SBHSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.25 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.63 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.593 | 10.672 | 24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 251M | 75.7M | 332% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.07 | 7.72 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.13 | 16.24 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.32 | 31.44 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 108.17 | 88.35 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.93 | 40.03 | 182% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...