Ad is loading...
CIISX vs SBHSX
CIISX vs SBHSX Comparison
Open Charts CIISX vs SBHSX
Causeway International Small Cap Instl
Price$13.97
Change-$0.10 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.1M
Segall Bryant & Hamill Intl Sm Cp Ret
Price$11.20
Change-$0.07 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.05M
CIISX vs SBHSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIISX vs. SBHSX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIISX is a StrongBuy and SBHSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIISX has more cash in the bank: 256M vs. SBHSX (72M). CIISX pays higher dividends than SBHSX: CIISX (5.84) vs SBHSX (4.33). CIISX was incepted earlier than SBHSX: CIISX (10 years) vs SBHSX (11 years). CIISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 133.00 vs. SBHSX (106.00). SBHSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIISX: SBHSX (2500) vs CIISX (1000000). SBHSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.83 vs. CIISX (3.59). CIISX return over 5 years is better than : 56.91 vs. SBHSX (30.08).
| CIISX | SBHSX | CIISX / SBHSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.481 | 5.362 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 256M | 72M | 356% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.84 | 4.33 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.59 | 12.83 | 28% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.69 | 18.68 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.91 | 30.08 | 189% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.99 | 39.32 | 224% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...