Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIISX vs SBHSX
CIISX vs SBHSX Comparison
Open Charts CIISX vs SBHSX
Causeway International Small Cap Instl
Price$16.88
Change-$0.19 (-1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.04M
Segall Bryant & Hamill Intl Sm Cp Ret
Price$14.34
Change-$0.16 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets83.41M
CIISX vs SBHSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIISX vs. SBHSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIISX is a Hold and SBHSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIISX has more cash in the bank: 283M vs. SBHSX (83.4M). SBHSX pays higher dividends than CIISX: SBHSX (6.56) vs CIISX (4.13). CIISX was incepted earlier than SBHSX: CIISX (11 years) vs SBHSX (11 years). SBHSX (1.72) is less costly to investors than CIISX (1.21). CIISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. SBHSX (102.00). SBHSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIISX: SBHSX (2500) vs CIISX (1000000). SBHSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.59 vs. CIISX (19.90). CIISX return over 5 years is better than : 95.63 vs. SBHSX (85.74).
| CIISX | SBHSX | CIISX / SBHSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.21 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.21 | 1.72 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.444 | 38.136 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2500 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283M | 83.4M | 339% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.13 | 6.56 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.90 | 37.59 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.26 | 80.28 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 95.63 | 85.74 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.85 | 84.67 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers