Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CILGX vs RMFCX
CILGX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CILGX vs RMFCX
Clarkston Institutional
Price$15.95
Change-$0.04 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets166.63M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$61.02
Change+$0.09 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.8B
CILGX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CILGX vs. RMFCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CILGX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. CILGX (167M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CILGX: RMFCX (1.21) vs CILGX (0.84). CILGX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CILGX (10 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CILGX (0.79). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CILGX (23.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CILGX: RMFCX (250) vs CILGX (10000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.00 vs. CILGX (2.71). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.67 vs. CILGX (23.73).
| CILGX | RMFCX | CILGX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.91 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.91 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.428 | 12.783 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 167M | 110B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 1.21 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.71 | 6.00 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.42 | 27.94 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.73 | 52.67 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 84.73 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers