Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CILGX vs RMFEX
CILGX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts CILGX vs RMFEX
Clarkston Institutional
Price$16.43
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets178.91M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$62.83
Change+$0.28 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.75B
CILGX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CILGX vs. RMFEX commentary
Oct 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CILGX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. CILGX (179M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than CILGX: RMFEX (1.46) vs CILGX (0.85). CILGX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: CILGX (10 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). CILGX (0.79) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CILGX (23.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CILGX: RMFEX (250) vs CILGX (10000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.17 vs. CILGX (6.01). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 63.21 vs. CILGX (33.40).
| CILGX | RMFEX | CILGX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.62 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.62 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.274 | 15.672 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 179M | 113B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.85 | 1.46 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.01 | 8.17 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.07 | 39.09 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.40 | 63.21 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 98.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers