Ad is loading...
CILGX vs RMFEX
CILGX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts CILGX vs RMFEX
Clarkston Institutional
Price$15.38
Change+$0.04 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets176.72M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$56.11
Change+$0.29 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.41B
CILGX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CILGX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CILGX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. CILGX (177M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than CILGX: RMFEX (1.95) vs CILGX (0.74). CILGX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: CILGX (9 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. CILGX (12.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CILGX: RMFEX (250) vs CILGX (10000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.78 vs. CILGX (7.63). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.96 vs. CILGX (25.07).
| CILGX | RMFEX | CILGX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.517 | 2.167 | -24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 177M | 103B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 1.95 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.63 | 12.78 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.34 | 13.63 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.07 | 39.96 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.41 | - |