Ad is loading...
CILGX vs RMFEX
CILGX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts CILGX vs RMFEX
Clarkston Institutional
Price$14.33
Change+$0.07 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets170.41M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$52.93
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.51B
CILGX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CILGX vs. RMFEX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CILGX is a StrongBuy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 96.5B vs. CILGX (170M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than CILGX: RMFEX (1.61) vs CILGX (0.89). CILGX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: CILGX (9 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). CILGX (0.79) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CILGX (23.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CILGX: RMFEX (250) vs CILGX (10000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.95 vs. CILGX (-2.04). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 51.09 vs. CILGX (45.39).
| CILGX | RMFEX | CILGX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.62 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.62 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.762 | -3.251 | 239% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 170M | 96.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 1.61 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.04 | 3.95 | -52% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.80 | 6.78 | -27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.39 | 51.09 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 58.82 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...