Ad is loading...
CILGX vs RMFEX
CILGX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts CILGX vs RMFEX
Clarkston Institutional
Price$14.93
Change-$0.21 (-1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets177.75M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$55.58
Change-$0.56 (-1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.33B
CILGX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CILGX vs. RMFEX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CILGX is a Hold and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 102B vs. CILGX (178M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than CILGX: RMFEX (1.56) vs CILGX (0.88). CILGX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: CILGX (9 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). CILGX (0.79) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CILGX (23.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CILGX: RMFEX (250) vs CILGX (10000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.31 vs. CILGX (2.38). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 66.45 vs. CILGX (57.79).
| CILGX | RMFEX | CILGX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.62 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.62 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.582 | 2.221 | -26% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 178M | 102B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.56 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.38 | 7.31 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.26 | 17.91 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.79 | 66.45 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 72.96 | - |