Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CILGX vs RMFEX
CILGX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts CILGX vs RMFEX
Clarkston Institutional
Price$16.37
Change+$0.11 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets191.32M
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.79
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
CILGX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CILGX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CILGX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. CILGX (191M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than CILGX: RMFEX (1.53) vs CILGX (0.87). CILGX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: CILGX (9 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). CILGX (0.79) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CILGX (23.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CILGX: RMFEX (250) vs CILGX (10000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.74 vs. CILGX (10.35). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 62.99 vs. CILGX (50.34).
| CILGX | RMFEX | CILGX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.62 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.62 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.886 | 11.527 | 51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 191M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.53 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.35 | 11.74 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.18 | 32.08 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.34 | 62.99 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 88.96 | - |