CILJF
Price
$1.86
Change
-$0.03 (-1.59%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
PIAIF
Price
$5.65
Change
-$0.27 (-4.56%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

CILJF vs PIAIF

Header iconCILJF vs PIAIF Comparison
Open Charts CILJF vs PIAIFBanner chart's image
China Life Insurance
Price$1.86
Change-$0.03 (-1.59%)
Volume$2.11K
CapitalizationN/A
Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China
Price$5.65
Change-$0.27 (-4.56%)
Volume$1.6K
CapitalizationN/A
CILJF vs PIAIF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CILJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIAIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CILJF vs. PIAIF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CILJF is a StrongSell and PIAIF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CILJF: $1.86 vs. PIAIF: $5.65)
Brand notoriety: CILJF and PIAIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CILJF: 22% vs. PIAIF: 215%
Market capitalization -- CILJF: $120.32B vs. PIAIF: $133.31B
CILJF [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $120.32B. PIAIF’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $133.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CILJF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePIAIF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CILJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PIAIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PIAIF is a better buy in the long-term than CILJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CILJF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PIAIF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CILJF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • PIAIF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PIAIF is a better buy in the short-term than CILJF.

Price Growth

CILJF (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -8.60% price change this week, while PIAIF (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -6.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -2.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.50%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-2.84% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PIAIF($133B) has a higher market cap than CILJF($120B). PIAIF has higher P/E ratio than CILJF: PIAIF (9.17) vs CILJF (7.98). CILJF YTD gains are higher at: 45.313 vs. PIAIF (25.556). PIAIF has more cash in the bank: 794B vs. CILJF (174B). CILJF has less debt than PIAIF: CILJF (49.1B) vs PIAIF (1.35T). PIAIF has higher revenues than CILJF: PIAIF (1.04T) vs CILJF (821B).
CILJFPIAIFCILJF / PIAIF
Capitalization120B133B90%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD45.31325.556177%
P/E Ratio7.989.1787%
Revenue821B1.04T79%
Total Cash174B794B22%
Total Debt49.1B1.35T4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CILJF vs PIAIF: Fundamental Ratings
CILJF
PIAIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5083
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4140
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9763
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8595

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PIAIF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as CILJF (13). This means that PIAIF’s stock grew similarly to CILJF’s over the last 12 months.

PIAIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CILJF (100). This means that PIAIF’s stock grew similarly to CILJF’s over the last 12 months.

PIAIF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CILJF (100). This means that PIAIF’s stock grew similarly to CILJF’s over the last 12 months.

PIAIF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CILJF (41). This means that PIAIF’s stock grew similarly to CILJF’s over the last 12 months.

PIAIF's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CILJF (97). This means that PIAIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CILJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CILJFPIAIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CILJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIAIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HART31.510.16
+0.50%
NYLI Healthy Hearts ETF
BOXX110.04N/A
N/A
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF
ILTB50.09N/A
N/A
iShares Core 10+ Year USD Bond ETF
ECML33.51N/A
N/A
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF
PPI14.91-0.22
-1.45%
AXS Astoria Real Assets ETF

CILJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CILJF has been loosely correlated with PNGAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CILJF jumps, then PNGAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CILJF
1D Price
Change %
CILJF100%
-1.59%
PNGAY - CILJF
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.64%
AAGIY - CILJF
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
PUK - CILJF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
AAIGF - CILJF
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.17%
PIAIF - CILJF
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.56%
More

PIAIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIAIF has been loosely correlated with PNGAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PIAIF jumps, then PNGAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIAIF
1D Price
Change %
PIAIF100%
-4.56%
PNGAY - PIAIF
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.64%
AAIGF - PIAIF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.17%
AAGIY - PIAIF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
CILJF - PIAIF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.59%
PUKPF - PIAIF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More