CILJF
Price
$1.84
Change
+$0.03 (+1.66%)
Updated
Apr 30 closing price
Capitalization
120.32B
PUK
Price
$21.21
Change
-$0.04 (-0.19%)
Updated
May 1, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
25.79B
Ad is loading...

CILJF vs PUK

Header iconCILJF vs PUK Comparison
Open Charts CILJF vs PUKBanner chart's image
China Life Insurance
Price$1.84
Change+$0.03 (+1.66%)
Volume$4.76K
Capitalization120.32B
Prudential
Price$21.21
Change-$0.04 (-0.19%)
Volume$9.27K
Capitalization25.79B
CILJF vs PUK Comparison Chart
Loading...
PUK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CILJF vs. PUK commentary
May 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CILJF is a Hold and PUK is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 02, 2025
Stock price -- (CILJF: $1.88 vs. PUK: $21.21)
Brand notoriety: CILJF and PUK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CILJF: 29% vs. PUK: 106%
Market capitalization -- CILJF: $120.32B vs. PUK: $25.79B
CILJF [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $120.32B. PUK’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $25.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CILJF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePUK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CILJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PUK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CILJF and PUK are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PUK’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PUK’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

CILJF (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +3.01% price change this week, while PUK (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -2.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

CILJF is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.

PUK is expected to report earnings on Mar 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+0.83% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CILJF($120B) has a higher market cap than PUK($25.8B). PUK has higher P/E ratio than CILJF: PUK (15.34) vs CILJF (7.98). PUK YTD gains are higher at: 35.324 vs. CILJF (-2.646). PUK has less debt than CILJF: PUK (4.87B) vs CILJF (49.1B). CILJF has higher revenues than PUK: CILJF (821B) vs PUK (12B).
CILJFPUKCILJF / PUK
Capitalization120B25.8B465%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.64635.324-7%
P/E Ratio7.9815.3452%
Revenue821B12B6,842%
Total Cash174BN/A-
Total Debt49.1B4.87B1,007%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CILJF vs PUK: Fundamental Ratings
CILJF
PUK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1924
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10093
SMR RATING
1..100
10096
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5540
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9863
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CILJF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PUK (72) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that CILJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PUK’s over the last 12 months.

PUK's Profit vs Risk Rating (93) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as CILJF (100) in the null industry. This means that PUK’s stock grew similarly to CILJF’s over the last 12 months.

PUK's SMR Rating (96) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as CILJF (100) in the null industry. This means that PUK’s stock grew similarly to CILJF’s over the last 12 months.

PUK's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as CILJF (55) in the null industry. This means that PUK’s stock grew similarly to CILJF’s over the last 12 months.

PUK's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CILJF (98) in the null industry. This means that PUK’s stock grew somewhat faster than CILJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PUK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PUK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLN18.810.17
+0.91%
First Trust Latin America AlphaDEX® ETF
AVSF46.940.06
+0.13%
Avantis Short-Term Fixed Income ETF
DECZ35.650.02
+0.06%
TrueShares Structured Outcome Dec ETF
JMST50.820.03
+0.05%
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Inc ETF
MXI82.09-0.41
-0.49%
iShares Global Materials ETF

CILJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CILJF has been loosely correlated with PNGAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CILJF jumps, then PNGAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CILJF
1D Price
Change %
CILJF100%
+1.66%
PNGAY - CILJF
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
AAGIY - CILJF
37%
Loosely correlated
+5.64%
PUK - CILJF
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.03%
AAIGF - CILJF
28%
Poorly correlated
+7.03%
PIAIF - CILJF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More