Ad is loading...
CIMAX vs WASAX
CIMAX vs WASAX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs WASAX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$25.61
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets129.24B
Macquarie Asset Strategy Fund Cl A
Price$22.40
Change+$0.08 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.77B
CIMAX vs WASAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. WASAX commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and WASAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 129B vs. WASAX (1.77B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than WASAX: CIMAX (3.85) vs WASAX (1.51). CIMAX was incepted earlier than WASAX: CIMAX (23 years) vs WASAX (25 years). WASAX (1.06) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.61). CIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. WASAX (54.00). WASAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CIMAX (4%) vs CIMAX (4%). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WASAX: CIMAX (250) vs WASAX (1000). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.28 vs. WASAX (4.21). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.78 vs. WASAX (30.75).
| CIMAX | WASAX | CIMAX / WASAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.06 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.06 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.871 | 5.131 | 114% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 129B | 1.77B | 7,305% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.85 | 1.51 | 255% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.28 | 4.21 | 244% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.16 | 12.73 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.78 | 30.75 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.86 | -5.31 | -1,128% |