Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs WASCX
CIMAX vs WASCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs WASCX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$27.22
Change-$0.06 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.64B
Macquarie Asset Strategy Fund Cl C
Price$21.28
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.79B
CIMAX vs WASCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. WASCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and WASCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. WASCX (1.79B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than WASCX: CIMAX (3.57) vs WASCX (0.72). CIMAX was incepted earlier than WASCX: CIMAX (24 years) vs WASCX (31 years). WASCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WASCX: CIMAX (250) vs WASCX (1000). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.74 vs. WASCX (4.70). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 39.98 vs. WASCX (5.85).
| CIMAX | WASCX | CIMAX / WASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.87 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.87 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.950 | 12.511 | 112% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 138B | 1.79B | 7,727% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.57 | 0.72 | 496% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.74 | 4.70 | 207% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.12 | 16.77 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.98 | 5.85 | 683% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.49 | 1.52 | 5,161% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement