Ad is loading...
CIMAX vs WASCX
CIMAX vs WASCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs WASCX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$25.39
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.21B
Macquarie Asset Strategy Fund Cl C
Price$19.67
Change+$0.01 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.74B
CIMAX vs WASCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. WASCX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and WASCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. WASCX (1.74B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than WASCX: CIMAX (3.85) vs WASCX (1.04). CIMAX was incepted earlier than WASCX: CIMAX (23 years) vs WASCX (30 years). WASCX (1.81) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.61). CIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. WASCX (54.00). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WASCX: CIMAX (250) vs WASCX (1000). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.65 vs. WASCX (1.58). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.45 vs. WASCX (18.85).
| CIMAX | WASCX | CIMAX / WASCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.81 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.81 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.962 | 3.461 | 143% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 1.74B | 7,339% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.85 | 1.04 | 371% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.65 | 1.58 | 609% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.32 | 7.87 | 233% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.45 | 18.85 | 252% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.94 | -14.74 | -407% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...