CINF vs PLMR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CINF is a Hold and PLMR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CINF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePLMR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CINF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PLMR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CINF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLMR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CINF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PLMR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CINF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -4.49% price change this week, while PLMR (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -4.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.12%.
Reported Earning Dates
CINF is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.
PLMR is expected to report earnings on Feb 12, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (-2.49% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
| CINF | PLMR | CINF / PLMR | |
| Capitalization | 19.5B | 2.09B | 935% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 43.338 | 89.027 | 49% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.48 | 26.26 | 40% |
| Revenue | 10B | 376M | 2,660% |
| Total Cash | 14.7B | 695M | 2,115% |
| Total Debt | 874M | 52.6M | 1,662% |
CINF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 82 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 51 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 36 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CINF | PLMR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 6 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 81% |
CINF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CINF has been closely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CINF jumps, then L could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CINF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CINF | 100% | +1.64% | ||
| L - CINF | 73% Closely correlated | +1.87% | ||
| HIG - CINF | 66% Closely correlated | +2.25% | ||
| AFG - CINF | 66% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| SIGI - CINF | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.28% | ||
| THG - CINF | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
More | ||||
PLMR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLMR has been loosely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLMR jumps, then L could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLMR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLMR | 100% | +1.06% | ||
| L - PLMR | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.87% | ||
| AFG - PLMR | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| MCY - PLMR | 45% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| RLI - PLMR | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| SKWD - PLMR | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.20% | ||
More | ||||