CINF
Price
$168.48
Change
+$0.10 (+0.06%)
Updated
Nov 26 closing price
Capitalization
26.29B
82 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PLMR
Price
$123.95
Change
+$0.11 (+0.09%)
Updated
Nov 26 closing price
Capitalization
3.28B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CINF vs PLMR

Header iconCINF vs PLMR Comparison
Open Charts CINF vs PLMRBanner chart's image
Cincinnati Financial
Price$168.48
Change+$0.10 (+0.06%)
Volume$718.01K
Capitalization26.29B
Palomar Holdings
Price$123.95
Change+$0.11 (+0.09%)
Volume$311.58K
Capitalization3.28B
CINF vs PLMR Comparison Chart in %
CINF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PLMR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CINF vs. PLMR commentary
Nov 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CINF is a StrongBuy and PLMR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CINF: $168.48 vs. PLMR: $123.95)
Brand notoriety: CINF and PLMR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CINF: 135% vs. PLMR: 113%
Market capitalization -- CINF: $26.29B vs. PLMR: $3.28B
CINF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $26.29B. PLMR’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $3.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $134.35B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CINF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePLMR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CINF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PLMR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CINF is a better buy in the long-term than PLMR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CINF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PLMR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CINF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PLMR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CINF is a better buy in the short-term than PLMR.

Price Growth

CINF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +4.23% price change this week, while PLMR (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -1.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +2.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

CINF is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2026.

PLMR is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+2.10% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CINF($26.3B) has a higher market cap than PLMR($3.29B). PLMR has higher P/E ratio than CINF: PLMR (19.34) vs CINF (12.54). CINF YTD gains are higher at: 19.322 vs. PLMR (17.388). CINF has more cash in the bank: 2.46B vs. PLMR (626M). PLMR has less debt than CINF: PLMR (0) vs CINF (883M). CINF has higher revenues than PLMR: CINF (12.1B) vs PLMR (680M).
CINFPLMRCINF / PLMR
Capitalization26.3B3.29B801%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD19.32217.388111%
P/E Ratio12.5419.3465%
Revenue12.1B680M1,779%
Total Cash2.46B626M393%
Total Debt883M0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CINF vs PLMR: Fundamental Ratings
CINF
PLMR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8284
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1866
SMR RATING
1..100
7240
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3154
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1274
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5020

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CINF's Valuation (59) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as PLMR (91). This means that CINF’s stock grew similarly to PLMR’s over the last 12 months.

CINF's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLMR (66). This means that CINF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLMR’s over the last 12 months.

PLMR's SMR Rating (40) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as CINF (72). This means that PLMR’s stock grew similarly to CINF’s over the last 12 months.

CINF's Price Growth Rating (31) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as PLMR (54). This means that CINF’s stock grew similarly to PLMR’s over the last 12 months.

CINF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PLMR (74). This means that CINF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PLMR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CINFPLMR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CINF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PLMR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSRKX21.040.20
+0.96%
Goldman Sachs International Eq Inc R
SGLIX34.790.21
+0.61%
SGI Global Equity I
GARIX22.910.11
+0.48%
Gotham Absolute Return Institutional
JABNX51.850.19
+0.37%
Janus Henderson Balanced N
MLVMX20.270.05
+0.25%
MFS Low Volatility Equity R1

PLMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PLMR has been loosely correlated with SKWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PLMR jumps, then SKWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLMR
1D Price
Change %
PLMR100%
+0.09%
SKWD - PLMR
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.59%
HIG - PLMR
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
BOW - PLMR
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.57%
RLI - PLMR
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
ALL - PLMR
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
More