CINF
Price
$148.59
Change
+$2.48 (+1.70%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
19.46B
18 days until earnings call
PRA
Price
$23.63
Change
+$0.66 (+2.87%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
650.38M
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CINF vs PRA

Header iconCINF vs PRA Comparison
Open Charts CINF vs PRABanner chart's image
Cincinnati Financial
Price$148.59
Change+$2.48 (+1.70%)
Volume$472.52K
Capitalization19.46B
ProAssurance
Price$23.63
Change+$0.66 (+2.87%)
Volume$2.86M
Capitalization650.38M
CINF vs PRA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CINF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CINF vs. PRA commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CINF is a StrongBuy and PRA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CINF: $148.59 vs. PRA: $23.63)
Brand notoriety: CINF and PRA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CINF: 90% vs. PRA: 530%
Market capitalization -- CINF: $19.46B vs. PRA: $650.38M
CINF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $19.46B. PRA’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $650.38M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CINF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePRA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CINF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PRA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CINF is a better buy in the long-term than PRA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CINF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PRA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CINF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • PRA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CINF is a better buy in the short-term than PRA.

Price Growth

CINF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +1.94% price change this week, while PRA (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +3.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

CINF is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

PRA is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.43% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CINF($19.5B) has a higher market cap than PRA($650M). PRA has higher P/E ratio than CINF: PRA (105.26) vs CINF (10.48). PRA YTD gains are higher at: 48.523 vs. CINF (4.649). CINF has more cash in the bank: 14.7B vs. PRA (3.8B). PRA has less debt than CINF: PRA (444M) vs CINF (874M). CINF has higher revenues than PRA: CINF (10B) vs PRA (1.13B).
CINFPRACINF / PRA
Capitalization19.5B650M3,000%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.64948.52310%
P/E Ratio10.48105.2610%
Revenue10B1.13B885%
Total Cash14.7B3.8B387%
Total Debt874M444M197%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CINF vs PRA: Fundamental Ratings
CINF
PRA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6716
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2066
SMR RATING
1..100
8990
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5041
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
920
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CINF's Valuation (53) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRA (96) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that CINF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRA’s over the last 12 months.

CINF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PRA (66) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that CINF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PRA’s over the last 12 months.

CINF's SMR Rating (89) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as PRA (90) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that CINF’s stock grew similarly to PRA’s over the last 12 months.

PRA's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Specialty Insurance industry is in the same range as CINF (50) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that PRA’s stock grew similarly to CINF’s over the last 12 months.

CINF's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as PRA (20) in the Specialty Insurance industry. This means that CINF’s stock grew similarly to PRA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CINFPRA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CINF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PRA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LRGG28.890.30
+1.05%
Macquarie Focused Large Growth ETF
DOCT41.300.18
+0.45%
FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Oct
ADIV17.780.04
+0.23%
SmartETFs Asia Pcfc Dvdnd Bldr ETF
FPEI19.040.03
+0.16%
First Trust Instl Pref Secs and Inc ETF
BNDI47.03-0.14
-0.30%
NEOS Enhanced Income Aggregate Bond ETF

CINF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CINF has been closely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CINF jumps, then L could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CINF
1D Price
Change %
CINF100%
+1.70%
L - CINF
84%
Closely correlated
+1.15%
CNA - CINF
79%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
HIG - CINF
77%
Closely correlated
+1.70%
THG - CINF
76%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
TRV - CINF
76%
Closely correlated
+2.64%
More