CINF
Price
$177.68
Change
+$2.95 (+1.69%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
27.27B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HIG
Price
$141.91
Change
-$1.14 (-0.80%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
38.9B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CINF vs HIG

CINF vs HIG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Cincinnati Financial (CINF) vs. The Hartford Financial Services Group (HIG) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both CINF and HIG operate primarily in the property and casualty insurance sector, with exposure to investment income and underwriting results.
  • HIG reported strong second-quarter 2026 results, including core earnings of $945 million and a new $4.2 billion share repurchase authorization.
  • CINF is scheduled to release its second-quarter 2026 earnings on or around July 27-28, 2026, following a first-quarter EPS beat.
  • Recent market activity shows CINF trading near $182–183 with a 52-week range of approximately $144–$195, while HIG has traded in the $134–$141 range amid positive earnings momentum.
  • Both companies maintain long dividend histories, though CINF stands out with 65 consecutive years of increases.
  • Sector-wide factors such as net investment income trends and catastrophe loss experience have influenced recent sentiment for both stocks.

Introduction

Investors and traders often compare CINF and HIG as established players in the insurance industry. Both companies generate revenue through underwriting property and casualty policies while managing substantial investment portfolios. This comparison appeals to those seeking exposure to the financials sector, particularly value-oriented or income-focused strategies that monitor earnings consistency, capital returns, and relative price behavior amid fluctuating interest rates and claims environments. The analysis highlights observable performance metrics and recent corporate actions without projecting future outcomes.

CINF Overview and Recent Performance

Cincinnati Financial Corporation provides commercial and personal property and casualty insurance through its subsidiaries. In recent market activity, the stock has traded near the upper end of its 52-week range following earlier gains. First-quarter 2026 results showed an EPS beat, and attention now centers on the upcoming second-quarter report. Sentiment has reflected steady dividend growth—marking 65 consecutive annual increases—and broader sector dynamics around investment yields. Price movements in recent weeks have remained within a range influenced by pre-earnings positioning rather than single-day catalysts.

HIG Overview and Recent Performance

The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. offers property and casualty insurance, group benefits, and investment products. Recent market activity has been supported by second-quarter 2026 results that featured core earnings growth and a significant share repurchase program authorization. Net income rose notably year-over-year, aided by investment income. The stock has shown resilience within its recent trading band following the earnings release, with sentiment shaped by capital return initiatives and underwriting trends common to the sector.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing market conditions earn placement in this section. Available bots exhibit varied trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, with examples including bots achieving win rates in ranges such as 55–75% or annualized returns spanning diverse outcomes depending on configuration. All operate on distinct ticker sets and risk parameters. Review the full selection on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed metrics.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Both companies follow similar business models centered on property and casualty underwriting with meaningful investment portfolios, though HIG maintains a larger scale in certain segments such as group benefits. Growth drivers differ in emphasis: HIG recently highlighted a substantial buyback program alongside earnings strength, while CINF emphasizes its extended dividend record. Recent momentum has favored HIG post-earnings, whereas CINF awaits its report. Risk factors remain comparable, including catastrophe exposure and interest-rate sensitivity on investments. Market sentiment reflects sector positioning, with both viewed as established names rather than high-growth outliers.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as recent earnings delivery and capital allocation actions, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable relative positioning to HIG over the near term, driven by confirmed results and buyback authorization. CINF shows steady characteristics pending its upcoming report. This assessment relies on trend consistency and catalyst visibility and does not constitute investment advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CINF vs. HIG commentary
Aug 02, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CINF is a Hold and HIG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 02, 2026
Stock price -- (CINF: $177.68 vs. HIG: $141.91)
Brand notoriety: CINF and HIG are both not notable
CINF represents the Property/Casualty Insurance, while HIG is part of the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CINF: 79% vs. HIG: 62%
Market capitalization -- CINF: $27.27B vs. HIG: $38.9B
CINF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $27.27B. HIG’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $38.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $135.29B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $13.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $19.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CINF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHIG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CINF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HIG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HIG is a better buy in the long-term than CINF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CINF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HIG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CINF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HIG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HIG is a better buy in the short-term than CINF.

Price Growth

CINF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -2.81% price change this week, while HIG (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was +0.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.92%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was +0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

CINF is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

HIG is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.46% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

@Multi-Line Insurance (+0.19% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HIG($38.9B) has a higher market cap than CINF($27.3B). HIG has higher P/E ratio than CINF: HIG (9.80) vs CINF (8.39). CINF YTD gains are higher at: 10.035 vs. HIG (3.914). CINF has less debt than HIG: CINF (884M) vs HIG (4.37B). HIG has higher revenues than CINF: HIG (28.5B) vs CINF (12.9B).
CINFHIGCINF / HIG
Capitalization27.3B38.9B70%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.0353.914256%
P/E Ratio8.399.8086%
Revenue12.9B28.5B45%
Total CashN/A21.8B-
Total Debt884M4.37B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CINF vs HIG: Fundamental Ratings
CINF
HIG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7826
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
303
SMR RATING
1..100
5050
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4934
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8666
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CINF's Valuation (40) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as HIG (42) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that CINF’s stock grew similarly to HIG’s over the last 12 months.

HIG's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as CINF (30) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that HIG’s stock grew similarly to CINF’s over the last 12 months.

HIG's SMR Rating (50) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as CINF (50) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that HIG’s stock grew similarly to CINF’s over the last 12 months.

HIG's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as CINF (49) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that HIG’s stock grew similarly to CINF’s over the last 12 months.

HIG's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as CINF (86) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that HIG’s stock grew similarly to CINF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CINFHIG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CINF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HIG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PTEN10.480.63
+6.40%
Patterson-UTI Energy
NX17.840.03
+0.17%
Quanex Building Products Corp
TONT10.82-0.01
-0.05%
Graf Global Corp
IR83.38-0.94
-1.11%
Ingersoll Rand
FEMY2.86-0.05
-1.72%
Femasys

CINF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CINF has been closely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CINF jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CINF
1D Price
Change %
CINF100%
+1.69%
HIG - CINF
84%
Closely correlated
-0.80%
L - CINF
72%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
THG - CINF
69%
Closely correlated
+1.10%
CNA - CINF
67%
Closely correlated
-1.48%
AFG - CINF
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.01%
More

HIG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HIG has been closely correlated with TRV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HIG jumps, then TRV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HIG
1D Price
Change %
HIG100%
-0.80%
TRV - HIG
88%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
L - HIG
86%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
CINF - HIG
84%
Closely correlated
+1.69%
ALL - HIG
81%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
THG - HIG
81%
Closely correlated
+1.10%
More