Advertisement
CINF vs UDR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CINF is a Buy and UDR is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CINF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUDR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CINF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- UDR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CINF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UDR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CINF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- UDR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CINF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -3.09% price change this week, while UDR (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +0.39% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -0.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.64%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.78%.
Reported Earning Dates
CINF is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.
UDR is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (-0.99% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.02% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
| CINF | UDR | CINF / UDR | |
| Capitalization | 19.5B | 12.1B | 161% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 1.35B | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.463 | -3.017 | -82% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.48 | 27.34 | 38% |
| Revenue | 10B | 1.63B | 614% |
| Total Cash | 14.7B | 2.92M | 503,080% |
| Total Debt | 874M | 5.99B | 15% |
CINF | UDR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 51 Fair valued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 62 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | 3 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CINF's Valuation (51) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UDR (92) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that CINF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UDR’s over the last 12 months.
CINF's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UDR (62) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that CINF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UDR’s over the last 12 months.
UDR's SMR Rating (85) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CINF (94) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that UDR’s stock grew similarly to CINF’s over the last 12 months.
CINF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as UDR (55) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that CINF’s stock grew similarly to UDR’s over the last 12 months.
UDR's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as CINF (9) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that UDR’s stock grew similarly to CINF’s over the last 12 months.
| CINF | UDR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 40% | 1 day ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 52% | 1 day ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 61% | 5 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 53% | 12 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 56% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| LKOR | 41.49 | -0.43 | -1.02% |
| FlexShares Crdt-Scrd US Lng Corp Bd ETF | |||
| NUMV | 35.19 | -0.40 | -1.12% |
| Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF | |||
| GSEW | 79.52 | -0.94 | -1.17% |
| Goldman Sachs Equal Wght US Lg Cp Eq ETF | |||
| IAF | 4.45 | -0.06 | -1.33% |
| abrdn Australia Equity Fund | |||
| VBR | 189.43 | -2.95 | -1.53% |
| Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | |||
CINF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CINF has been closely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CINF jumps, then L could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CINF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CINF | 100% | -1.27% | ||
| L - CINF | 84% Closely correlated | -0.58% | ||
| CNA - CINF | 79% Closely correlated | -0.98% | ||
| HIG - CINF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| THG - CINF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| TRV - CINF | 76% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
More | ||||
UDR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UDR has been closely correlated with EQR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UDR jumps, then EQR could also see price increases.