CINGF
Price
$0.07
Change
+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
CLOQ
Price
$0.29
Change
-$0.02 (-6.45%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

CINGF vs CLOQ

Header iconCINGF vs CLOQ Comparison
Open Charts CINGF vs CLOQBanner chart's image
Coinsilium Group
Price$0.07
Change+$0.01 (+16.67%)
Volume$93.43K
CapitalizationN/A
Cyberloq Technologies
Price$0.29
Change-$0.02 (-6.45%)
Volume$21.15K
CapitalizationN/A
CINGF vs CLOQ Comparison Chart
Loading...
CINGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLOQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CINGF vs. CLOQ commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CINGF is a Hold and CLOQ is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CINGF: $0.07 vs. CLOQ: $0.29)
Brand notoriety: CINGF and CLOQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CINGF: 69% vs. CLOQ: 164%
Market capitalization -- CINGF: $2.1M vs. CLOQ: $8.03M
CINGF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $2.1M. CLOQ’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $8.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CINGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCLOQ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CINGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CLOQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CINGF is a better buy in the long-term than CLOQ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CINGF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLOQ’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CINGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CLOQ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLOQ is a better buy in the short-term than CINGF.

Price Growth

CINGF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +44.33% price change this week, while CLOQ (@Packaged Software) price change was +20.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLOQ is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.25% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLOQ($8.03M) has a higher market cap than CINGF($2.1M). CINGF YTD gains are higher at: 225.581 vs. CLOQ (166.055). CINGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 318K vs. CLOQ (-485.05K). CINGF has more cash in the bank: 173K vs. CLOQ (18.7K). CINGF has higher revenues than CLOQ: CINGF (214K) vs CLOQ (3.36K).
CINGFCLOQCINGF / CLOQ
Capitalization2.1M8.03M26%
EBITDA318K-485.05K-66%
Gain YTD225.581166.055136%
P/E Ratio175.44N/A-
Revenue214K3.36K6,361%
Total Cash173K18.7K925%
Total DebtN/A275K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CINGF vs CLOQ: Fundamental Ratings
CINGF
CLOQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8389
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8760
SMR RATING
1..100
65100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3435
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3650

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CINGF's Valuation (83) in the null industry is in the same range as CLOQ (94). This means that CINGF’s stock grew similarly to CLOQ’s over the last 12 months.

CLOQ's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as CINGF (87). This means that CLOQ’s stock grew similarly to CINGF’s over the last 12 months.

CINGF's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLOQ (100). This means that CINGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLOQ’s over the last 12 months.

CINGF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as CLOQ (35). This means that CINGF’s stock grew similarly to CLOQ’s over the last 12 months.

CINGF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLOQ (100). This means that CINGF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLOQ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CINGFCLOQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CINGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLOQ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSBCX25.07-0.08
-0.32%
Goldman Sachs Income Builder C
REIPX35.00-0.18
-0.51%
T. Rowe Price Equity Income I
NARCX53.21-0.36
-0.67%
Voya Multi-Manager International Sm Cp C
COSTX10.14-0.07
-0.69%
Columbia Overseas Core Institutional 2
MAECX11.06-0.37
-3.24%
BlackRock Emerging Markets Ex-Chn Inst

CINGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CINGF and VENZF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CINGF and VENZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CINGF
1D Price
Change %
CINGF100%
+17.65%
VENZF - CINGF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRGT - CINGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.45%
FOXO - CINGF
23%
Poorly correlated
-8.80%
SWONF - CINGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCOEF - CINGF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CLOQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLOQ and SDCH have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLOQ and SDCH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLOQ
1D Price
Change %
CLOQ100%
-7.02%
SDCH - CLOQ
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.47%
CLRI - CLOQ
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDTAF - CLOQ
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
CMPD - CLOQ
2%
Poorly correlated
-12.64%
CINGF - CLOQ
1%
Poorly correlated
+17.65%
More