CINGF
Price
$0.12
Change
+$0.01 (+9.09%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
2.1M
CLOQ
Price
$0.20
Change
+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
8.03M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CINGF vs CLOQ

Header iconCINGF vs CLOQ Comparison
Open Charts CINGF vs CLOQBanner chart's image
Coinsilium Group
Price$0.12
Change+$0.01 (+9.09%)
Volume$760.23K
Capitalization2.1M
Cyberloq Technologies
Price$0.20
Change+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Volume$28.48K
Capitalization8.03M
CINGF vs CLOQ Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CINGF vs. CLOQ commentary
Jun 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CINGF is a Hold and CLOQ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 02, 2025
Stock price -- (CINGF: $0.12 vs. CLOQ: $0.20)
Brand notoriety: CINGF and CLOQ are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CINGF: 166% vs. CLOQ: 244%
Market capitalization -- CINGF: $2.1M vs. CLOQ: $8.03M
CINGF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $2.1M. CLOQ’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $8.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CINGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCLOQ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CINGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CLOQ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CINGF is a better buy in the long-term than CLOQ.

Price Growth

CINGF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +75.18% price change this week, while CLOQ (@Packaged Software) price change was -11.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLOQ is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.64% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLOQ($8.03M) has a higher market cap than CINGF($2.1M). CINGF YTD gains are higher at: 150.261 vs. CLOQ (-31.917). CINGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 318K vs. CLOQ (-485.05K). CINGF has more cash in the bank: 173K vs. CLOQ (18.7K). CINGF has higher revenues than CLOQ: CINGF (214K) vs CLOQ (3.36K).
CINGFCLOQCINGF / CLOQ
Capitalization2.1M8.03M26%
EBITDA318K-485.05K-66%
Gain YTD150.261-31.917-471%
P/E Ratio175.44N/A-
Revenue214K3.36K6,361%
Total Cash173K18.7K925%
Total DebtN/A275K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CINGF vs CLOQ: Fundamental Ratings
CINGF
CLOQ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7980
SMR RATING
1..100
64100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3465
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CINGF's Valuation (81) in the null industry is in the same range as CLOQ (98). This means that CINGF’s stock grew similarly to CLOQ’s over the last 12 months.

CINGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as CLOQ (80). This means that CINGF’s stock grew similarly to CLOQ’s over the last 12 months.

CINGF's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLOQ (100). This means that CINGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLOQ’s over the last 12 months.

CINGF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as CLOQ (65). This means that CINGF’s stock grew similarly to CLOQ’s over the last 12 months.

CINGF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLOQ (100). This means that CINGF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLOQ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INPSX35.820.34
+0.96%
ProFunds Internet UltraSector Svc
CMLCX57.030.18
+0.32%
American Funds American Mutual 529C
MUOAX30.030.09
+0.30%
Morgan Stanley Instl US Core A
CTCAX86.24-0.36
-0.42%
Columbia Global Technology Growth A
GTCSX28.85-0.17
-0.59%
Glenmede Small Cap Equity Adv

CINGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CINGF and VENZF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CINGF and VENZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CINGF
1D Price
Change %
CINGF100%
+6.67%
VENZF - CINGF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRGT - CINGF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.17%
FOXO - CINGF
23%
Poorly correlated
-7.48%
SWONF - CINGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCOEF - CINGF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CLOQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLOQ and SDCH have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLOQ and SDCH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLOQ
1D Price
Change %
CLOQ100%
+8.59%
SDCH - CLOQ
22%
Poorly correlated
-8.33%
CDTAF - CLOQ
4%
Poorly correlated
-4.57%
CMPD - CLOQ
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.19%
CINGF - CLOQ
1%
Poorly correlated
+6.67%
CMDXF - CLOQ
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.58%
More