CINGF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.02 (-16.67%)
Updated
Jun 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.1M
FOXO
Price
$0.40
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.43M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CINGF vs FOXO

Header iconCINGF vs FOXO Comparison
Open Charts CINGF vs FOXOBanner chart's image
Coinsilium Group
Price$0.10
Change-$0.02 (-16.67%)
Volume$362.91K
Capitalization2.1M
FOXO Technologies
Price$0.40
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$400
Capitalization3.43M
CINGF vs FOXO Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CINGF vs. FOXO commentary
Jun 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CINGF is a Hold and FOXO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CINGF: $0.10 vs. FOXO: $0.40)
Brand notoriety: CINGF and FOXO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CINGF: 75% vs. FOXO: 22%
Market capitalization -- CINGF: $2.1M vs. FOXO: $3.43M
CINGF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $2.1M. FOXO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CINGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFOXO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CINGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FOXO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CINGF and FOXO are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

CINGF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +46.42% price change this week, while FOXO (@Packaged Software) price change was -21.08% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

FOXO is expected to report earnings on Apr 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.16% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOXO($3.43M) has a higher market cap than CINGF($2.1M). CINGF has higher P/E ratio than FOXO: CINGF (175.44) vs FOXO (0.01). CINGF YTD gains are higher at: 109.176 vs. FOXO (-86.183). CINGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 318K vs. FOXO (-74.35M). FOXO has higher revenues than CINGF: FOXO (457K) vs CINGF (214K).
CINGFFOXOCINGF / FOXO
Capitalization2.1M3.43M61%
EBITDA318K-74.35M-0%
Gain YTD109.176-86.183-127%
P/E Ratio175.440.011,702,626%
Revenue214K457K47%
Total Cash173KN/A-
Total DebtN/A3.86M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CINGF: Fundamental Ratings
CINGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
75
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDPSX92.33N/A
N/A
ProFunds Mid Cap Svc
WFPDX11.74N/A
N/A
Allspring Premier Large Co Gr Adm
AIORX9.84N/A
N/A
American Century International Opps R
RWINX12.28N/A
N/A
Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical Intl N
FIQWX17.10N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc Z

CINGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CINGF and VENZF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CINGF and VENZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CINGF
1D Price
Change %
CINGF100%
-16.42%
VENZF - CINGF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRGT - CINGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+7.48%
FOXO - CINGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
SWONF - CINGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
CCOEF - CINGF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FOXO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOXO has been loosely correlated with QLYS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOXO jumps, then QLYS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOXO
1D Price
Change %
FOXO100%
+0.42%
QLYS - FOXO
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.56%
INTA - FOXO
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
DJCO - FOXO
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.97%
INFA - FOXO
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
HKD - FOXO
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
More