Ad is loading...
CINGF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
FOXO
Price
$0.67
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

CINGF vs FOXO

Header iconCINGF vs FOXO Comparison
Open Charts CINGF vs FOXOBanner chart's image
Coinsilium Group
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$413.6K
CapitalizationN/A
FOXO Technologies
Price$0.67
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$75.25M
CapitalizationN/A
CINGF vs FOXO Comparison Chart
Loading...
FOXO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CINGF vs. FOXO commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CINGF is a Hold and FOXO is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CINGF: $0.04 vs. FOXO: $0.67)
Brand notoriety: CINGF and FOXO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CINGF: 312% vs. FOXO: 126%
Market capitalization -- CINGF: $2.1M vs. FOXO: $3.43M
CINGF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $2.1M. FOXO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CINGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFOXO’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CINGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FOXO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FOXO is a better buy in the long-term than CINGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FOXO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FOXO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CINGF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +9.37% price change this week, while FOXO (@Packaged Software) price change was +34.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

FOXO is expected to report earnings on May 11, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.01% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOXO($3.43M) has a higher market cap than CINGF($2.1M). CINGF has higher P/E ratio than FOXO: CINGF (175.44) vs FOXO (0.01). FOXO YTD gains are higher at: 108.821 vs. CINGF (62.791). CINGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 318K vs. FOXO (-74.35M). FOXO has higher revenues than CINGF: FOXO (457K) vs CINGF (214K).
CINGFFOXOCINGF / FOXO
Capitalization2.1M3.43M61%
EBITDA318K-74.35M-0%
Gain YTD62.791108.82158%
P/E Ratio175.440.011,702,626%
Revenue214K457K47%
Total Cash173KN/A-
Total DebtN/A3.86M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CINGF: Fundamental Ratings
CINGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
96
SMR RATING
1..100
64
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FOXO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FOXO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IFTAX10.080.03
+0.30%
Voya International High Div Low Vol A
SGDIX52.82-0.12
-0.23%
Sprott Gold Equity Institutional
KNGYX12.84-0.05
-0.39%
Vest S&P500 Div Aristocrats Trgt IncY
JHEQX33.26-0.31
-0.92%
JPMorgan Hedged Equity I
ECTGX105.01-1.63
-1.53%
Eaton Vance Tx-Mgd Growth 1.1 C

CINGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CINGF and VENZF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CINGF and VENZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CINGF
1D Price
Change %
CINGF100%
N/A
VENZF - CINGF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRGT - CINGF
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.56%
FOXO - CINGF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
SWONF - CINGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCOEF - CINGF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FOXO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOXO has been loosely correlated with QLYS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOXO jumps, then QLYS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOXO
1D Price
Change %
FOXO100%
-0.36%
QLYS - FOXO
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.59%
DJCO - FOXO
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.67%
UPBD - FOXO
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.03%
AGYS - FOXO
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
WEX - FOXO
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
More