CINGF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.02 (-16.67%)
Updated
Jun 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.1M
SWONF
Price
$9.29
Change
+$1.31 (+16.44%)
Updated
May 28 closing price
Capitalization
3.32B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CINGF vs SWONF

Header iconCINGF vs SWONF Comparison
Open Charts CINGF vs SWONFBanner chart's image
Coinsilium Group
Price$0.10
Change-$0.02 (-16.67%)
Volume$362.91K
Capitalization2.1M
SOFTWAREONE HLDG AG
Price$9.29
Change+$1.31 (+16.44%)
Volume$1.96K
Capitalization3.32B
CINGF vs SWONF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CINGF vs. SWONF commentary
Jun 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CINGF is a Hold and SWONF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CINGF: $0.10 vs. SWONF: $9.21)
Brand notoriety: CINGF and SWONF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CINGF: 75% vs. SWONF: 15%
Market capitalization -- CINGF: $2.1M vs. SWONF: $3.32B
CINGF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $2.1M. SWONF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CINGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSWONF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CINGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SWONF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SWONF is a better buy in the long-term than CINGF.

Price Growth

CINGF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +46.42% price change this week, while SWONF (@Packaged Software) price change was +15.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.16% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SWONF($3.32B) has a higher market cap than CINGF($2.1M). CINGF has higher P/E ratio than SWONF: CINGF (175.44) vs SWONF (97.09). CINGF YTD gains are higher at: 109.176 vs. SWONF (40.611). SWONF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 171M vs. CINGF (318K). SWONF has more cash in the bank: 253M vs. CINGF (173K). SWONF has higher revenues than CINGF: SWONF (1.02B) vs CINGF (214K).
CINGFSWONFCINGF / SWONF
Capitalization2.1M3.32B0%
EBITDA318K171M0%
Gain YTD109.17640.611269%
P/E Ratio175.4497.09181%
Revenue214K1.02B0%
Total Cash173K253M0%
Total DebtN/A4.34M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CINGF: Fundamental Ratings
CINGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
75
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
83
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WBEIX13.17N/A
N/A
William Blair Emerging Mkts Growth I
RMOCX17.02N/A
N/A
Victory RS Mid Cap Growth C
JNRFX86.19N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Research D
OGMIX37.55N/A
N/A
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals R6
BRSYX13.56N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq R6

CINGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CINGF and VENZF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CINGF and VENZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CINGF
1D Price
Change %
CINGF100%
-16.42%
VENZF - CINGF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRGT - CINGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+7.48%
FOXO - CINGF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
SWONF - CINGF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
CCOEF - CINGF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SWONF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SWONF has been loosely correlated with OTEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SWONF jumps, then OTEX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWONF
1D Price
Change %
SWONF100%
-0.81%
OTEX - SWONF
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
BMR - SWONF
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.42%
AWRE - SWONF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
MSFT - SWONF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
XIGMF - SWONF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More