CINGF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.1M
SWONF
Price
$6.55
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.32B
Ad is loading...

CINGF vs SWONF

Header iconCINGF vs SWONF Comparison
Open Charts CINGF vs SWONFBanner chart's image
Coinsilium Group
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$48.42K
Capitalization2.1M
SOFTWAREONE HLDG AG
Price$6.55
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$265
Capitalization3.32B
CINGF vs SWONF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CINGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWONF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CINGF vs. SWONF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CINGF is a Hold and SWONF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CINGF: $0.05 vs. SWONF: $6.55)
Brand notoriety: CINGF and SWONF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CINGF: 45% vs. SWONF: 10%
Market capitalization -- CINGF: $2.1M vs. SWONF: $3.32B
CINGF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $2.1M. SWONF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $3.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CINGF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSWONF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CINGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SWONF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CINGF is a better buy in the long-term than SWONF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CINGF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SWONF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CINGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SWONF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SWONF is a better buy in the short-term than CINGF.

Price Growth

CINGF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -9.31% price change this week, while SWONF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+2.15% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SWONF($3.32B) has a higher market cap than CINGF($2.1M). CINGF has higher P/E ratio than SWONF: CINGF (175.44) vs SWONF (97.09). SWONF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. CINGF (-3.545). SWONF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 171M vs. CINGF (318K). SWONF has more cash in the bank: 253M vs. CINGF (173K). SWONF has higher revenues than CINGF: SWONF (1.02B) vs CINGF (214K).
CINGFSWONFCINGF / SWONF
Capitalization2.1M3.32B0%
EBITDA318K171M0%
Gain YTD-3.5450.000-
P/E Ratio175.4497.09181%
Revenue214K1.02B0%
Total Cash173K253M0%
Total DebtN/A4.34M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CINGF: Fundamental Ratings
CINGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90
SMR RATING
1..100
66
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CINGFSWONF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
33%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
45%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
79%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
86%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CINGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWONF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MPGSX11.220.13
+1.17%
MassMutual Disciplined Gr R5
AGYGX11.670.11
+0.95%
American Century Focused Global Gr Y
FVLAX20.290.09
+0.45%
Fidelity Advisor Value Leaders A
HIMDX24.430.11
+0.45%
Hennessy Cornerstone Mid Cap 30 Instl
JENYX58.640.22
+0.38%
Jensen Quality Growth Y

CINGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CINGF and VENZF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CINGF and VENZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CINGF
1D Price
Change %
CINGF100%
-12.74%
VENZF - CINGF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRGT - CINGF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.16%
FOXO - CINGF
23%
Poorly correlated
-26.98%
SWONF - CINGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCOEF - CINGF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SWONF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SWONF has been loosely correlated with OTEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SWONF jumps, then OTEX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWONF
1D Price
Change %
SWONF100%
N/A
OTEX - SWONF
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
BMR - SWONF
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.02%
RTNXF - SWONF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AWRE - SWONF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
MSFT - SWONF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
More