Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIOIX vs HFQRX
CIOIX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts CIOIX vs HFQRX
Causeway International Opps Inst
Price$19.24
Change-$0.11 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets374.14M
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$7.04
Change-$0.03 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.3B
CIOIX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIOIX vs. HFQRX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIOIX is a Buy and HFQRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.3B vs. CIOIX (374M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than CIOIX: HFQRX (7.42) vs CIOIX (2.77). CIOIX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: CIOIX (16 years) vs HFQRX (10 years). CIOIX (0.99) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. CIOIX (69.00). CIOIX (1000000) and HFQRX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.72 vs. CIOIX (16.49). CIOIX return over 5 years is better than : 80.90 vs. HFQRX (72.11).
| CIOIX | HFQRX | CIOIX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.70 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.70 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 24.678 | 21.986 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 374M | 6.3B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.77 | 7.42 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.49 | 22.72 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.13 | 50.60 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.90 | 72.11 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers