Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIOIX vs HFQRX
CIOIX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts CIOIX vs HFQRX
Causeway International Opps Inst
Price$19.76
Change-$0.15 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets384.08M
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$6.96
Change-$0.05 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.7B
CIOIX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIOIX vs. HFQRX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIOIX is a Hold and HFQRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.7B vs. CIOIX (384M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than CIOIX: HFQRX (7.24) vs CIOIX (2.57). CIOIX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: CIOIX (16 years) vs HFQRX (10 years). CIOIX (0.99) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. CIOIX (69.00). CIOIX (1000000) and HFQRX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HFQRX (20.72) and CIOIX (20.08) have marching annual gain over last year. CIOIX return over 5 years is better than : 64.62 vs. HFQRX (59.64).
| CIOIX | HFQRX | CIOIX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.70 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.70 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.286 | 22.066 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 384M | 6.7B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.57 | 7.24 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.08 | 20.72 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.07 | 45.56 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.62 | 59.64 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers