Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIOIX vs HFQRX
CIOIX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts CIOIX vs HFQRX
Causeway International Opps Inst
Price$19.22
Change+$0.04 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets366.68M
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$7.04
Change+$0.06 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.44B
CIOIX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIOIX vs. HFQRX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIOIX is a Buy and HFQRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.44B vs. CIOIX (367M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than CIOIX: HFQRX (7.21) vs CIOIX (2.68). CIOIX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: CIOIX (16 years) vs HFQRX (10 years). CIOIX (0.99) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. CIOIX (69.00). CIOIX (1000000) and HFQRX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.27 vs. CIOIX (12.90). CIOIX return over 5 years is better than : 75.37 vs. HFQRX (71.38).
| CIOIX | HFQRX | CIOIX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.70 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.70 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 23.582 | 21.468 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 367M | 6.44B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.68 | 7.21 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.90 | 20.27 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.80 | 55.40 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.37 | 71.38 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.43 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers