Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIOIX vs HFQRX
CIOIX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts CIOIX vs HFQRX
Causeway International Opps Inst
Price$20.21
Change-$0.07 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets388.7M
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$7.01
Change-$0.02 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.62B
CIOIX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIOIX vs. HFQRX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIOIX is a Buy and HFQRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.62B vs. CIOIX (389M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than CIOIX: HFQRX (7.29) vs CIOIX (2.61). CIOIX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: CIOIX (16 years) vs HFQRX (10 years). CIOIX (0.99) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. CIOIX (69.00). CIOIX (1000000) and HFQRX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.32 vs. CIOIX (15.05). CIOIX return over 5 years is better than : 86.34 vs. HFQRX (72.71).
| CIOIX | HFQRX | CIOIX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.70 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.70 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.670 | 23.293 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 389M | 6.62B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.61 | 7.29 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.05 | 18.32 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 93.93 | 66.15 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 86.34 | 72.71 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 109.61 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement