Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIOIX vs HFQRX
CIOIX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts CIOIX vs HFQRX
Causeway International Opps Inst
Price$18.16
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets346.33M
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$6.92
Change+$0.02 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.96B
CIOIX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIOIX vs. HFQRX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIOIX is a StrongBuy and HFQRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 5.96B vs. CIOIX (346M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than CIOIX: HFQRX (7.44) vs CIOIX (2.89). CIOIX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: CIOIX (15 years) vs HFQRX (10 years). CIOIX (0.99) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. CIOIX (69.00). CIOIX (1000000) and HFQRX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.49 vs. CIOIX (7.70). CIOIX return over 5 years is better than : 69.54 vs. HFQRX (64.57).
| CIOIX | HFQRX | CIOIX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.70 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.70 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.946 | 15.862 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 346M | 5.96B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.89 | 7.44 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.70 | 15.49 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.90 | 30.19 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 69.54 | 64.57 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement