Ad is loading...
CIOIX vs HFQRX
CIOIX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts CIOIX vs HFQRX
Causeway International Opps Inst
Price$15.64
Change+$0.96 (+6.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets276.47M
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$6.01
Change+$0.21 (+3.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.77B
CIOIX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIOIX vs. HFQRX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIOIX is a Hold and HFQRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 5.77B vs. CIOIX (276M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than CIOIX: HFQRX (7.88) vs CIOIX (3.07). CIOIX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: CIOIX (15 years) vs HFQRX (9 years). CIOIX (0.99) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. CIOIX (69.00). CIOIX (1000000) and HFQRX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.82 vs. CIOIX (-7.92). CIOIX return over 5 years is better than : 63.52 vs. HFQRX (55.44).
| CIOIX | HFQRX | CIOIX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.70 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.70 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.412 | -2.608 | 208% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 276M | 5.77B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.07 | 7.88 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.92 | 0.82 | -969% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.08 | 7.54 | 173% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.52 | 55.44 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.43 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...