Ad is loading...
CION
Price
$11.85
Change
+$0.15 (+1.28%)
Updated
Nov 25 closing price
107 days until earnings call
EQS
Price
$1.21
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 25 closing price
Ad is loading...

CION vs EQS

Header iconCION vs EQS Comparison
Open Charts CION vs EQSBanner chart's image
CION Investment
Price$11.85
Change+$0.15 (+1.28%)
Volume$246.27K
CapitalizationN/A
Equus Total Return
Price$1.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.77K
CapitalizationN/A
CION vs EQS Comparison Chart
Loading...
CION
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CION vs. EQS commentary
Nov 26, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CION is a StrongBuy and EQS is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 26, 2024
Stock price -- (CION: $11.85 vs. EQS: $1.21)
Brand notoriety: CION and EQS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CION: 135% vs. EQS: 42%
Market capitalization -- CION: $592.29M vs. EQS: $20.28M
CION [@Investment Managers] is valued at $592.29M. EQS’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $20.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CION’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileEQS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CION’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • EQS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CION is a better buy in the long-term than EQS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CION’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EQS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CION’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • EQS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CION is a better buy in the short-term than EQS.

Price Growth

CION (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.04% price change this week, while EQS (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

CION is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.

EQS is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.12% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CION($592M) has a higher market cap than EQS($20.3M). CION has higher P/E ratio than EQS: CION (6.37) vs EQS (1.85). CION YTD gains are higher at: 15.187 vs. EQS (-16.557). EQS has less debt than CION: EQS (18M) vs CION (1.08B). CION has higher revenues than EQS: CION (107M) vs EQS (15.1M).
CIONEQSCION / EQS
Capitalization592M20.3M2,916%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.187-16.557-92%
P/E Ratio6.371.85344%
Revenue107M15.1M709%
Total Cash6.81MN/A-
Total Debt1.08B18M6,011%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EQS: Fundamental Ratings
EQS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
17
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
72
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIONEQS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
52%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CION
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RFISX19.760.32
+1.65%
Ranger Small Cap Institutional
JAIGX44.670.54
+1.22%
Janus Henderson VIT Overseas Instl
PROVX21.360.22
+1.04%
Provident Trust Strategy
TGADX28.100.15
+0.54%
Templeton Growth Adv
GSMGX15.84N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Growth C

CION and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CION has been loosely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CION jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CION
1D Price
Change %
CION100%
+1.28%
TROW - CION
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.61%
VRTS - CION
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
JHG - CION
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
FSK - CION
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
SLRC - CION
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.91%
More

EQS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EQS and AAMCF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EQS and AAMCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EQS
1D Price
Change %
EQS100%
N/A
AAMCF - EQS
30%
Poorly correlated
-7.41%
CION - EQS
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
ICMB - EQS
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
TSLX - EQS
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.77%
ALTI - EQS
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.94%
More