Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIOVX vs HFQRX
CIOVX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts CIOVX vs HFQRX
Causeway International Opps I
Price$17.99
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets346.33M
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$6.92
Change+$0.02 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.96B
CIOVX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIOVX vs. HFQRX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIOVX is a StrongBuy and HFQRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 5.96B vs. CIOVX (346M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than CIOVX: HFQRX (7.44) vs CIOVX (2.70). CIOVX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: CIOVX (15 years) vs HFQRX (10 years). CIOVX (1.24) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. CIOVX (69.00). CIOVX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: CIOVX (5000) vs HFQRX (1000000). HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.49 vs. CIOVX (7.38). CIOVX (67.38) and HFQRX (64.57) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CIOVX | HFQRX | CIOVX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.70 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.70 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.829 | 15.862 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 1000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 346M | 5.96B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.70 | 7.44 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.38 | 15.49 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.83 | 30.19 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.38 | 64.57 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement