Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIOVX vs HFQRX
CIOVX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts CIOVX vs HFQRX
Causeway International Opps I
Price$19.60
Change-$0.07 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets381.29M
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$6.96
Change+$0.04 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.59B
CIOVX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIOVX vs. HFQRX commentary
Oct 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIOVX is a Hold and HFQRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.59B vs. CIOVX (381M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than CIOVX: HFQRX (7.29) vs CIOVX (2.44). CIOVX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: CIOVX (16 years) vs HFQRX (10 years). CIOVX (1.24) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. CIOVX (69.00). CIOVX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: CIOVX (5000) vs HFQRX (1000000). HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.32 vs. CIOVX (12.27). CIOVX return over 5 years is better than : 84.82 vs. HFQRX (72.70).
| CIOVX | HFQRX | CIOVX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.70 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.70 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.810 | 22.066 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 1000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 381M | 6.59B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.44 | 7.29 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.27 | 17.32 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 90.83 | 65.73 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 84.82 | 72.70 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement