Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIOVX vs HFQRX
CIOVX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts CIOVX vs HFQRX
Causeway International Opps I
Price$18.77
Change+$0.07 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets365.14M
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$6.92
Change+$0.02 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.3B
CIOVX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIOVX vs. HFQRX commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIOVX is a Buy and HFQRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.3B vs. CIOVX (365M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than CIOVX: HFQRX (7.42) vs CIOVX (2.58). CIOVX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: CIOVX (16 years) vs HFQRX (10 years). CIOVX (1.24) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. CIOVX (69.00). CIOVX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: CIOVX (5000) vs HFQRX (1000000). HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.51 vs. CIOVX (11.04). CIOVX return over 5 years is better than : 76.30 vs. HFQRX (72.48).
| CIOVX | HFQRX | CIOVX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.70 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.70 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.507 | 19.052 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 1000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 365M | 6.3B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.58 | 7.42 | 35% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.04 | 17.51 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.19 | 49.97 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.30 | 72.48 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.18 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers