Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIOVX vs HFQRX
CIOVX vs HFQRX Comparison
Open Charts CIOVX vs HFQRX
Causeway International Opps I
Price$19.55
Change-$0.14 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets384.08M
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income N
Price$6.96
Change-$0.05 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.7B
CIOVX vs HFQRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIOVX vs. HFQRX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIOVX is a Hold and HFQRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HFQRX has more cash in the bank: 6.7B vs. CIOVX (384M). HFQRX pays higher dividends than CIOVX: HFQRX (7.24) vs CIOVX (2.40). CIOVX was incepted earlier than HFQRX: CIOVX (16 years) vs HFQRX (10 years). CIOVX (1.24) is less costly to investors than HFQRX (0.70). HFQRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 155.00 vs. CIOVX (69.00). CIOVX has a lower initial minimum investment than HFQRX: CIOVX (5000) vs HFQRX (1000000). HFQRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.72 vs. CIOVX (19.61). CIOVX (62.34) and HFQRX (59.64) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CIOVX | HFQRX | CIOVX / HFQRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.70 | 171% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.70 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.940 | 22.066 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 1000000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 384M | 6.7B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.40 | 7.24 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.61 | 20.72 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.63 | 45.56 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.34 | 59.64 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers