Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIRRX vs FRLCX
CIRRX vs FRLCX Comparison
Open Charts CIRRX vs FRLCX
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities R
Price$17.78
Change+$0.03 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.3B
Nuveen Real Estate Securities C
Price$14.00
Change+$0.06 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets858.01M
CIRRX vs FRLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIRRX vs. FRLCX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIRRX is a Buy and FRLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIRRX has more cash in the bank: 8.3B vs. FRLCX (858M). FRLCX pays higher dividends than CIRRX: FRLCX (2.65) vs CIRRX (2.37). CIRRX was incepted earlier than FRLCX: CIRRX (11 years) vs FRLCX (26 years). FRLCX (2.02) is less costly to investors than CIRRX (1.25). FRLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. CIRRX (35.00). CIRRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRLCX: CIRRX (0) vs FRLCX (2500). CIRRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.06 vs. FRLCX (-8.08). CIRRX return over 5 years is better than : 29.91 vs. FRLCX (-11.78).
| CIRRX | FRLCX | CIRRX / FRLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.93 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 2.02 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.434 | 2.554 | 213% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.3B | 858M | 968% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.37 | 2.65 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.06 | -8.08 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.03 | -4.53 | -531% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.91 | -11.78 | -254% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.74 | -25.14 | -238% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement