Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CISGX vs GFACX
CISGX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CISGX vs GFACX
Touchstone Sands Capital Select Gr Instl
Price$21.43
Change+$0.06 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.52B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$72.89
Change+$0.12 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
CISGX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CISGX vs. GFACX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CISGX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. CISGX (2.52B). CISGX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CISGX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CISGX (5 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than CISGX (0.84). CISGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than CISGX: GFACX (250) vs CISGX (500000). CISGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.10 vs. GFACX (11.95). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 27.88 vs. CISGX (-35.10).
| CISGX | GFACX | CISGX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.36 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 1.36 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.920 | 14.319 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.52B | 328B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.10 | 11.95 | 260% |
| Returns for 3 years | 98.79 | 46.01 | 215% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.10 | 27.88 | -126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.38 | 76.96 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement