CISS
Price
$3.26
Change
-$0.04 (-1.21%)
Updated
Jun 27, 04:26 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.58M
NMPRY
Price
$3.80
Change
-$0.70 (-15.56%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
136.96M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CISS vs NMPRY

Header iconCISS vs NMPRY Comparison
Open Charts CISS vs NMPRYBanner chart's image
C3is
Price$3.26
Change-$0.04 (-1.21%)
Volume$120
Capitalization2.58M
Navios Maritime Holdings
Price$3.80
Change-$0.70 (-15.56%)
Volume$100
Capitalization136.96M
CISS vs NMPRY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CISS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CISS vs. NMPRY commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CISS is a Hold and NMPRY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CISS: $3.30 vs. NMPRY: $3.80)
Brand notoriety: CISS and NMPRY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CISS: 60% vs. NMPRY: 82%
Market capitalization -- CISS: $2.58M vs. NMPRY: $136.96M
CISS [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $2.58M. NMPRY’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $136.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $31.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $4.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CISS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNMPRY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CISS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NMPRY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NMPRY is a better buy in the long-term than CISS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CISS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CISS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

CISS (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -5.71% price change this week, while NMPRY (@Marine Shipping) price change was -15.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -1.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

CISS is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-1.08% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMPRY($137M) has a higher market cap than CISS($2.58M). NMPRY has higher P/E ratio than CISS: NMPRY (0.98) vs CISS (0.01). NMPRY YTD gains are higher at: 88.119 vs. CISS (-61.458).
CISSNMPRYCISS / NMPRY
Capitalization2.58M137M2%
EBITDA9.85MN/A-
Gain YTD-61.45888.119-70%
P/E Ratio0.010.981%
Revenue36.5MN/A-
Total Cash15.7MN/A-
Total Debt12.9KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NMPRY: Fundamental Ratings
NMPRY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
96
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CISS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CISS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LINA.X0.0000350.000029
+438.89%
Linear Finance cryptocurrency
NKN.X0.0246310.000269
+1.10%
NKN cryptocurrency
USDP.X0.999276-0.000392
-0.04%
Pax Dollar cryptocurrency
ENA.X0.249712-0.008105
-3.14%
Ethena cryptocurrency
ASTR.X0.022234-0.000836
-3.62%
Astar cryptocurrency

CISS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CISS and CTRM have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CISS and CTRM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CISS
1D Price
Change %
CISS100%
-0.15%
CTRM - CISS
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.53%
DAC - CISS
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
AMKBF - CISS
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
USEA - CISS
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.74%
TORO - CISS
8%
Poorly correlated
-3.24%
More

NMPRY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMPRY has been loosely correlated with NMPGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NMPRY jumps, then NMPGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMPRY
1D Price
Change %
NMPRY100%
N/A
NMPGY - NMPRY
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DPBSF - NMPRY
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CISS - NMPRY
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
ECO - NMPRY
-2%
Poorly correlated
-1.28%
HAFN - NMPRY
-8%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
More