CITE
Price
$11.85
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 10 closing price
Capitalization
110.7M
TRTLF
Price
$11.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 6 closing price
Capitalization
279.09M
Ad is loading...

CITE vs TRTLF

Header iconCITE vs TRTLF Comparison
Open Charts CITE vs TRTLFBanner chart's image
Cartica Acquisition
Price$11.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$407
Capitalization110.7M
TortoiseEcofin Acquisition Corp. III
Price$11.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization279.09M
CITE vs TRTLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CITE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CITE vs. TRTLF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CITE is a Hold and TRTLF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CITE: $11.85 vs. TRTLF: $11.06)
Brand notoriety: CITE and TRTLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CITE: 1% vs. TRTLF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CITE: $110.7M vs. TRTLF: $279.09M
CITE [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $110.7M. TRTLF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $279.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $3.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CITE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRTLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CITE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TRTLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CITE is a better buy in the long-term than TRTLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CITE’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CITE’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

CITE (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TRTLF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

CITE is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.19% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRTLF($279M) has a higher market cap than CITE($111M). CITE has higher P/E ratio than TRTLF: CITE (39.35) vs TRTLF (37.17). CITE YTD gains are higher at: 0.254 vs. TRTLF (0.000). CITE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.8M vs. TRTLF (-2.73M). CITE has more cash in the bank: 21.3K vs. TRTLF (13.1K). CITE has less debt than TRTLF: CITE (100K) vs TRTLF (715K). CITE (0) and TRTLF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CITETRTLFCITE / TRTLF
Capitalization111M279M40%
EBITDA-1.8M-2.73M66%
Gain YTD0.2540.000-
P/E Ratio39.3537.17106%
Revenue00-
Total Cash21.3K13.1K163%
Total Debt100K715K14%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CITETRTLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
14%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
11%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
9%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
9%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
7%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CITE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NXPL1.110.02
+1.83%
NextPlat Corp
APPS2.000.03
+1.52%
Digital Turbine
IHS3.210.02
+0.63%
IHS Holding Limited
TXG15.08-0.01
-0.07%
10x Genomics
HUBS704.44-12.89
-1.80%
HUBSPOT

CITE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CITE has been loosely correlated with CITEU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CITE jumps, then CITEU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CITE
1D Price
Change %
CITE100%
N/A
CITEU - CITE
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ABL - CITE
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
HYAC - CITE
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FORLU - CITE
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVCPU - CITE
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TRTLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TRTLF and GLAC have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TRTLF and GLAC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRTLF
1D Price
Change %
TRTLF100%
N/A
GLAC - TRTLF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
IVCA - TRTLF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VMCA - TRTLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLMIU - TRTLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CITE - TRTLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More