Ad is loading...
CITZ
Price
$30.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 11 closing price
GWBK
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.01 (-11.11%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

CITZ vs GWBK

Header iconCITZ vs GWBK Comparison
Open Charts CITZ vs GWBKBanner chart's image
Citizens Bancshares Corp South Carolina
Price$30.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$400
CapitalizationN/A
GATEWAY BK F S B OAKLAND CALIF
Price$0.08
Change-$0.01 (-11.11%)
Volume$108.01K
CapitalizationN/A
CITZ vs GWBK Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CITZ vs. GWBK commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CITZ is a Hold and GWBK is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CITZ: $30.08 vs. GWBK: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: CITZ and GWBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CITZ: 57% vs. GWBK: 635%
Market capitalization -- CITZ: $25.63M vs. GWBK: $0
CITZ [@Regional Banks] is valued at $25.63M. GWBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CITZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGWBK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CITZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GWBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CITZ is a better buy in the long-term than GWBK.

Price Growth

CITZ (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GWBK (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.40% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CITZ YTD gains are higher at: 8.922 vs. GWBK (-46.667).
CITZGWBKCITZ / GWBK
Capitalization25.6MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.922-46.667-19%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue16.5MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt5.22MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IMTB42.790.01
+0.02%
iShares Core 5-10 Year USD Bond ETF
TYO14.57N/A
N/A
Direxion Daily 7-10 Yr Trs Bear 3X ETF
AMTR75.29N/A
N/A
ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy TR ETN
SCHE27.47-0.06
-0.22%
Schwab Emerging Markets Equity ETF™
FSEP45.46-0.31
-0.68%
FT Cboe Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Sep

CITZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CITZ has been loosely correlated with MLYNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CITZ jumps, then MLYNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CITZ
1D Price
Change %
CITZ100%
N/A
MLYNF - CITZ
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KSBI - CITZ
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBNY - CITZ
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.13%
GWBK - CITZ
6%
Poorly correlated
-5.88%
MBBC - CITZ
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GWBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GWBK has been loosely correlated with BKIMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GWBK jumps, then BKIMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GWBK
1D Price
Change %
GWBK100%
-5.88%
BKIMF - GWBK
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KPCPF - GWBK
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMBN - GWBK
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
PGNN - GWBK
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CITZ - GWBK
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More