CITZ
Price
$30.33
Change
-$0.92 (-2.94%)
Updated
Jul 9 closing price
Capitalization
25.63M
GWBK
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

CITZ vs GWBK

Header iconCITZ vs GWBK Comparison
Open Charts CITZ vs GWBKBanner chart's image
Citizens Bancshares Corp South Carolina
Price$30.33
Change-$0.92 (-2.94%)
Volume$100
Capitalization25.63M
Gateway Bank, F.S.B. (Oakland, CA)
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
CapitalizationN/A
CITZ vs GWBK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CITZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GWBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CITZ vs. GWBK commentary
Aug 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CITZ is a Hold and GWBK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CITZ: $30.33 vs. GWBK: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: CITZ and GWBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CITZ: 63% vs. GWBK: 29%
Market capitalization -- CITZ: $25.63M vs. GWBK: $0
CITZ [@Regional Banks] is valued at $25.63M. GWBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CITZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGWBK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CITZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GWBK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GWBK is a better buy in the long-term than CITZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CITZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GWBK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CITZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GWBK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CITZ is a better buy in the short-term than GWBK.

Price Growth

CITZ (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GWBK (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.67%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GWBK YTD gains are higher at: 36.713 vs. CITZ (3.526).
CITZGWBKCITZ / GWBK
Capitalization25.6MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.52636.71310%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue16.5MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt5.22MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CITZ: Fundamental Ratings
CITZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
25
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63
SMR RATING
1..100
57
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
85
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CITZGWBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CITZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GWBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SYLD65.020.31
+0.48%
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
NORW28.710.04
+0.14%
Global X MSCI Norway ETF
AGG99.250.03
+0.03%
iShares Core US Aggregate Bond ETF
CMCI25.18N/A
N/A
VanEck® CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF
JUCY22.14-0.08
-0.36%
Aptus Enhanced Yield ETF

CITZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CITZ has been loosely correlated with MLYNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CITZ jumps, then MLYNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CITZ
1D Price
Change %
CITZ100%
N/A
MLYNF - CITZ
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KSBI - CITZ
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBNY - CITZ
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GWBK - CITZ
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBBC - CITZ
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
More

GWBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GWBK has been loosely correlated with BKIMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GWBK jumps, then BKIMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GWBK
1D Price
Change %
GWBK100%
N/A
BKIMF - GWBK
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KPCPF - GWBK
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMBN - GWBK
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
PGNN - GWBK
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CITZ - GWBK
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More