CITZ
Price
$32.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
62.44M
MBBC
Price
$10.33
Change
-$0.05 (-0.48%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
30.39M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CITZ vs MBBC

Header iconCITZ vs MBBC Comparison
Open Charts CITZ vs MBBCBanner chart's image
Citizens Bancshares Corp South Carolina
Price$32.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization62.44M
Marathon Ban
Price$10.33
Change-$0.05 (-0.48%)
Volume$3.4K
Capitalization30.39M
CITZ vs MBBC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CITZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CITZ vs. MBBC commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CITZ is a Hold and MBBC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CITZ: $32.00 vs. MBBC: $10.33)
Brand notoriety: CITZ and MBBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CITZ: 67% vs. MBBC: 59%
Market capitalization -- CITZ: $62.44M vs. MBBC: $30.39M
CITZ [@Regional Banks] is valued at $62.44M. MBBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $30.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CITZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMBBC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CITZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MBBC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CITZ is a better buy in the long-term than MBBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CITZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBBC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CITZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MBBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBBC is a better buy in the short-term than CITZ.

Price Growth

CITZ (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.23% price change this week, while MBBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CITZ($62.4M) has a higher market cap than MBBC($30.4M). MBBC has higher P/E ratio than CITZ: MBBC (34.20) vs CITZ (6.36). CITZ YTD gains are higher at: 9.215 vs. MBBC (-46.252). CITZ has more cash in the bank: 5.1M vs. MBBC (2.82M). CITZ has less debt than MBBC: CITZ (5.22M) vs MBBC (15M). CITZ has higher revenues than MBBC: CITZ (35.6M) vs MBBC (6.43M).
CITZMBBCCITZ / MBBC
Capitalization62.4M30.4M205%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.215-46.252-20%
P/E Ratio6.3634.2019%
Revenue35.6M6.43M554%
Total Cash5.1M2.82M181%
Total Debt5.22M15M35%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CITZ: Fundamental Ratings
CITZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
98
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
60
SMR RATING
1..100
56
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
51
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
80
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CITZMBBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
39%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CITZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FMCB1040.009.74
+0.95%
Farmers & Merchants Bancorp
CAWW0.64N/A
N/A
CCA Industries, Inc.
GIPIF2.33N/A
N/A
GREEN IMPACT PARTNERS INC
AVIKF8.21N/A
N/A
Advanced Info Service Public Co., Ltd.
TWODY13.37-0.11
-0.83%
Taylor Wimpey Plc

CITZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CITZ has been loosely correlated with MLYNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CITZ jumps, then MLYNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CITZ
1D Price
Change %
CITZ100%
N/A
MLYNF - CITZ
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KSBI - CITZ
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBNY - CITZ
24%
Poorly correlated
-5.88%
GWBK - CITZ
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBBC - CITZ
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
More

MBBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MBBC and FGBI have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MBBC and FGBI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBBC
1D Price
Change %
MBBC100%
-0.50%
FGBI - MBBC
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.13%
HMST - MBBC
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
PPLL - MBBC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLBZ - MBBC
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
JTNB - MBBC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More