CITZ
Price
$29.00
Change
-$0.25 (-0.85%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
25.63M
UNBK
Price
$51.00
Change
+$1.00 (+2.00%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Ad is loading...

CITZ vs UNBK

Header iconCITZ vs UNBK Comparison
Open Charts CITZ vs UNBKBanner chart's image
Citizens Bancshares Corp South Carolina
Price$29.00
Change-$0.25 (-0.85%)
Volume$337
Capitalization25.63M
United National Bank (Cairo, GA)
Price$51.00
Change+$1.00 (+2.00%)
Volume$250
CapitalizationN/A
CITZ vs UNBK Comparison Chart
Loading...
CITZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CITZ vs. UNBK commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CITZ is a Hold and UNBK is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CITZ: $29.00 vs. UNBK: $51.00)
Brand notoriety: CITZ and UNBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CITZ: 16% vs. UNBK: 69%
Market capitalization -- CITZ: $25.63M vs. UNBK: $0
CITZ [@Regional Banks] is valued at $25.63M. UNBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CITZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUNBK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CITZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UNBK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, UNBK is a better buy in the long-term than CITZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CITZ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNBK’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CITZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • UNBK’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CITZ and UNBK are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CITZ (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.85% price change this week, while UNBK (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UNBK YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. CITZ (-1.024).
CITZUNBKCITZ / UNBK
Capitalization25.6MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.0240.000-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue16.5MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt5.22MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CITZ vs UNBK: Fundamental Ratings
CITZ
UNBK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
53100
SMR RATING
1..100
53100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7244
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6147
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
26n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CITZ's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as UNBK (52). This means that CITZ’s stock grew similarly to UNBK’s over the last 12 months.

CITZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNBK (100). This means that CITZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNBK’s over the last 12 months.

CITZ's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNBK (100). This means that CITZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNBK’s over the last 12 months.

UNBK's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CITZ (72). This means that UNBK’s stock grew similarly to CITZ’s over the last 12 months.

UNBK's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as CITZ (61). This means that UNBK’s stock grew similarly to CITZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CITZUNBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
17%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
21%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
18%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
40%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
4%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CITZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FFDKX97.610.87
+0.90%
Fidelity K
AGGRX10.220.09
+0.89%
American Century Focused Global Gr A
DQEIX11.750.07
+0.60%
BNY Mellon Global Equity Income - I
RYMGX51.500.17
+0.33%
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth A
AFNAX25.190.08
+0.32%
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth A

CITZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CITZ has been loosely correlated with MLYNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CITZ jumps, then MLYNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CITZ
1D Price
Change %
CITZ100%
N/A
MLYNF - CITZ
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KSBI - CITZ
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBNY - CITZ
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.85%
GWBK - CITZ
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MBBC - CITZ
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

UNBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UNBK has been loosely correlated with BPCGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UNBK jumps, then BPCGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNBK
1D Price
Change %
UNBK100%
N/A
BPCGF - UNBK
34%
Loosely correlated
+3.23%
KPCPF - UNBK
33%
Loosely correlated
-10.15%
TYFG - UNBK
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LNKB - UNBK
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
CITZ - UNBK
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More