CIWV
Price
$27.00
Change
+$1.00 (+3.85%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.75M
CMAKY
Price
$4.48
Change
-$0.03 (-0.67%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
23.21B
Ad is loading...

CIWV vs CMAKY

Header iconCIWV vs CMAKY Comparison
Open Charts CIWV vs CMAKYBanner chart's image
Citizens Financial Corp. (WV)
Price$27.00
Change+$1.00 (+3.85%)
Volume$210
Capitalization3.75M
China Minsheng Banking
Price$4.48
Change-$0.03 (-0.67%)
Volume$6.83K
Capitalization23.21B
CIWV vs CMAKY Comparison Chart
Loading...
CIWV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMAKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIWV vs. CMAKY commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIWV is a Hold and CMAKY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (CIWV: $27.00 vs. CMAKY: $4.48)
Brand notoriety: CIWV and CMAKY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIWV: 95% vs. CMAKY: 227%
Market capitalization -- CIWV: $3.75M vs. CMAKY: $23.21B
CIWV [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.75M. CMAKY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $23.21B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIWV’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCMAKY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CIWV’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CMAKY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIWV is a better buy in the long-term than CMAKY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIWV’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMAKY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIWV’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CMAKY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CIWV and CMAKY are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CIWV (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.85% price change this week, while CMAKY (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMAKY($23.2B) has a higher market cap than CIWV($3.75M). CMAKY YTD gains are higher at: 16.062 vs. CIWV (12.421). CIWV has less debt than CMAKY: CIWV (33.3M) vs CMAKY (668B). CMAKY has higher revenues than CIWV: CMAKY (143B) vs CIWV (10.8M).
CIWVCMAKYCIWV / CMAKY
Capitalization3.75M23.2B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.42116.06277%
P/E RatioN/A3.71-
Revenue10.8M143B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt33.3M668B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIWV vs CMAKY: Fundamental Ratings
CIWV
CMAKY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
897
SMR RATING
1..100
491
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3939
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2620
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMAKY's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as CIWV (28). This means that CMAKY’s stock grew similarly to CIWV’s over the last 12 months.

CIWV's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMAKY (97). This means that CIWV’s stock grew significantly faster than CMAKY’s over the last 12 months.

CMAKY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CIWV (49). This means that CMAKY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CIWV’s over the last 12 months.

CMAKY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as CIWV (39). This means that CMAKY’s stock grew similarly to CIWV’s over the last 12 months.

CMAKY's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as CIWV (26). This means that CMAKY’s stock grew similarly to CIWV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIWVCMAKY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
29%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CIWV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMAKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SEKIX18.360.16
+0.88%
DWS Emerging Markets Equity Inst
MADVX19.580.12
+0.62%
BlackRock Equity Dividend Instl
THIGX37.960.21
+0.56%
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth I
DDERX14.900.07
+0.47%
Macquarie Wealth Builder R6
NAMAX14.200.06
+0.42%
Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Instl

CMAKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMAKY and PONT have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMAKY and PONT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMAKY
1D Price
Change %
CMAKY100%
-0.78%
PONT - CMAKY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLST - CMAKY
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
CNBB - CMAKY
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
CIXPF - CMAKY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIWV - CMAKY
10%
Poorly correlated
+4.85%
More