CKHGY
Price
$116.89
Change
+$1.67 (+1.45%)
Updated
Nov 17 closing price
Capitalization
26.93B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LYG
Price
$4.62
Change
-$0.10 (-2.12%)
Updated
Nov 19, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
68.99B
91 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CKHGY vs LYG

Header iconCKHGY vs LYG Comparison
Open Charts CKHGY vs LYGBanner chart's image
Capitec Bank Holdings
Price$116.89
Change+$1.67 (+1.45%)
Volume$1.36K
Capitalization26.93B
Lloyds Banking Group
Price$4.62
Change-$0.10 (-2.12%)
Volume$67.56K
Capitalization68.99B
CKHGY vs LYG Comparison Chart in %
CKHGY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LYG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CKHGY vs. LYG commentary
Nov 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CKHGY is a Hold and LYG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 20, 2025
Stock price -- (CKHGY: $116.89 vs. LYG: $4.72)
Brand notoriety: CKHGY and LYG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CKHGY: 72% vs. LYG: 185%
Market capitalization -- CKHGY: $26.84B vs. LYG: $68.99B
CKHGY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $26.84B. LYG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $68.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CKHGY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLYG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CKHGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LYG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CKHGY and LYG are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CKHGY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LYG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CKHGY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LYG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CKHGY and LYG are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CKHGY (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.53% price change this week, while LYG (@Regional Banks) price change was -5.60% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

LYG is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.96% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LYG($69B) has a higher market cap than CKHGY($26.9B). CKHGY has higher P/E ratio than LYG: CKHGY (30.21) vs LYG (15.74). LYG YTD gains are higher at: 81.421 vs. CKHGY (42.906). CKHGY has higher revenues than LYG: CKHGY (48.4B) vs LYG (19.4B).
CKHGYLYGCKHGY / LYG
Capitalization26.9B69B39%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD42.90681.42153%
P/E Ratio30.2115.74192%
Revenue48.4B19.4B249%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A88.3B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CKHGY vs LYG: Fundamental Ratings
CKHGY
LYG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1422
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
187
SMR RATING
1..100
35
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4443
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
418
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LYG's Valuation (82) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CKHGY (94) in the null industry. This means that LYG’s stock grew similarly to CKHGY’s over the last 12 months.

LYG's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CKHGY (18) in the null industry. This means that LYG’s stock grew similarly to CKHGY’s over the last 12 months.

CKHGY's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as LYG (5) in the Major Banks industry. This means that CKHGY’s stock grew similarly to LYG’s over the last 12 months.

LYG's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as CKHGY (44) in the null industry. This means that LYG’s stock grew similarly to CKHGY’s over the last 12 months.

LYG's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CKHGY (41) in the null industry. This means that LYG’s stock grew somewhat faster than CKHGY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CKHGYLYG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CKHGY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LYG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPB32.660.03
+0.10%
GraniteShares 2x Long AAPL Daily ETF
SPAB25.820.01
+0.04%
State Street® SPDR® Port Aggt Bd ETF
BRHY51.73-0.02
-0.04%
iShares High Yield Active ETF
UNOV37.31-0.11
-0.30%
Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF Nov
EYLD38.35-0.22
-0.57%
Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF

CKHGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CKHGY has been loosely correlated with NDBKY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CKHGY jumps, then NDBKY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CKHGY
1D Price
Change %
CKHGY100%
N/A
NDBKY - CKHGY
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
DNBBY - CKHGY
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
AGRPY - CKHGY
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.00%
LYG - CKHGY
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
BSAC - CKHGY
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
More