CKISF
Price
$6.66
Change
+$0.11 (+1.68%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
13.33B
CLPHY
Price
$8.38
Change
-$0.06 (-0.71%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
20.56B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CKISF vs CLPHY

Header iconCKISF vs CLPHY Comparison
Open Charts CKISF vs CLPHYBanner chart's image
CK Infrastructure Holdings
Price$6.66
Change+$0.11 (+1.68%)
Volume$500
Capitalization13.33B
CLP Holdings
Price$8.38
Change-$0.06 (-0.71%)
Volume$19.94K
Capitalization20.56B
CKISF vs CLPHY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CKISF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLPHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CKISF vs. CLPHY commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CKISF is a Hold and CLPHY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CKISF: $6.66 vs. CLPHY: $8.38)
Brand notoriety: CKISF and CLPHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CKISF: 55% vs. CLPHY: 36%
Market capitalization -- CKISF: $13.33B vs. CLPHY: $20.56B
CKISF [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $13.33B. CLPHY’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $20.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $131.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $18.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CKISF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLPHY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CKISF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CLPHY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CKISF is a better buy in the long-term than CLPHY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CKISF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLPHY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CKISF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • CLPHY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLPHY is a better buy in the short-term than CKISF.

Price Growth

CKISF (@Electric Utilities) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CLPHY (@Electric Utilities) price change was -0.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +0.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

CKISF is expected to report earnings on Apr 15, 2025.

CLPHY is expected to report earnings on Mar 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+0.90% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLPHY($20.6B) has a higher market cap than CKISF($13.3B). CLPHY has higher P/E ratio than CKISF: CLPHY (175.44) vs CKISF (12.84). CLPHY YTD gains are higher at: 4.191 vs. CKISF (-7.465). CLPHY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.2B vs. CKISF (9.98B). CLPHY has higher revenues than CKISF: CLPHY (101B) vs CKISF (6.84B).
CKISFCLPHYCKISF / CLPHY
Capitalization13.3B20.6B65%
EBITDA9.98B12.2B82%
Gain YTD-7.4654.191-178%
P/E Ratio12.84175.447%
Revenue6.84B101B7%
Total Cash9.59BN/A-
Total Debt28.6BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CKISF vs CLPHY: Fundamental Ratings
CKISF
CLPHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5584
SMR RATING
1..100
98100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5755
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4393
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CKISF's Valuation (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLPHY (96). This means that CKISF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLPHY’s over the last 12 months.

CKISF's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPHY (84). This means that CKISF’s stock grew similarly to CLPHY’s over the last 12 months.

CKISF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPHY (100). This means that CKISF’s stock grew similarly to CLPHY’s over the last 12 months.

CLPHY's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as CKISF (57). This means that CLPHY’s stock grew similarly to CKISF’s over the last 12 months.

CKISF's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLPHY (93). This means that CKISF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLPHY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CKISFCLPHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
33%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CKISF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLPHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KNW2.450.52
+26.94%
Know Labs Inc
STRL236.677.95
+3.48%
Sterling Infrastructure
DCOMP19.300.06
+0.31%
Dime Community Bancshares
NVEE23.17-0.05
-0.22%
NV5 Global Inc
NUKK10.91-0.46
-4.09%
Nukkleus Inc New

CKISF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CKISF and CHUEF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CKISF and CHUEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CKISF
1D Price
Change %
CKISF100%
N/A
CHUEF - CKISF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLPHY - CKISF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
AGLXY - CKISF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDUAF - CKISF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
CKISY - CKISF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CLPHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLPHY and HGKGY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLPHY and HGKGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLPHY
1D Price
Change %
CLPHY100%
-0.71%
HGKGY - CLPHY
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.05%
SSEZY - CLPHY
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.94%
EDPFY - CLPHY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
HRNNF - CLPHY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KEP - CLPHY
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
More