CKISF
Price
$6.88
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 30 closing price
CLPHY
Price
$8.95
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
Ad is loading...

CKISF vs CLPHY

Header iconCKISF vs CLPHY Comparison
Open Charts CKISF vs CLPHYBanner chart's image
CK Infrastructure Holdings
Price$6.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
CLP Holdings
Price$8.95
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$34.5K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CKISF vs CLPHY Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLPHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
CKISF vs. CLPHY commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CKISF is a Hold and CLPHY is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CKISF: $6.88 vs. CLPHY: $8.58)
Brand notoriety: CKISF and CLPHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CKISF: 4% vs. CLPHY: 107%
Market capitalization -- CKISF: $13.33B vs. CLPHY: $20.56B
CKISF [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $13.33B. CLPHY’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $20.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $131.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $18.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CKISF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLPHY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CKISF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CLPHY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CKISF is a better buy in the long-term than CLPHY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLPHY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CLPHY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

CKISF (@Electric Utilities) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CLPHY (@Electric Utilities) price change was +0.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was -1.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLPHY is expected to report earnings on Feb 28, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (-1.67% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLPHY($20.6B) has a higher market cap than CKISF($13.3B). CLPHY has higher P/E ratio than CKISF: CLPHY (175.44) vs CKISF (12.84). CKISF YTD gains are higher at: 26.239 vs. CLPHY (9.414). CLPHY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.2B vs. CKISF (9.98B). CLPHY has higher revenues than CKISF: CLPHY (101B) vs CKISF (6.84B).
CKISFCLPHYCKISF / CLPHY
Capitalization13.3B20.6B65%
EBITDA9.98B12.2B82%
Gain YTD26.2399.414279%
P/E Ratio12.84175.447%
Revenue6.84B101B7%
Total Cash9.59BN/A-
Total Debt28.6BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CKISF vs CLPHY: Fundamental Ratings
CKISF
CLPHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4160
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8686
SMR RATING
1..100
98100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4651
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5371
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLPHY's Valuation (22) in the null industry is in the same range as CKISF (42). This means that CLPHY’s stock grew similarly to CKISF’s over the last 12 months.

CLPHY's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as CKISF (86). This means that CLPHY’s stock grew similarly to CKISF’s over the last 12 months.

CKISF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPHY (100). This means that CKISF’s stock grew similarly to CLPHY’s over the last 12 months.

CKISF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPHY (51). This means that CKISF’s stock grew similarly to CLPHY’s over the last 12 months.

CKISF's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPHY (71). This means that CKISF’s stock grew similarly to CLPHY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLPHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
46%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLPHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

CKISF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CKISF and CHUEF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CKISF and CHUEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CKISF
1D Price
Change %
CKISF100%
N/A
CHUEF - CKISF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGLXY - CKISF
9%
Poorly correlated
+7.61%
CLPHY - CKISF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
CDUAF - CKISF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
CKISY - CKISF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CLPHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLPHY and HGKGY have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLPHY and HGKGY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLPHY
1D Price
Change %
CLPHY100%
-0.55%
HGKGY - CLPHY
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.46%
SSEZY - CLPHY
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
EDPFY - CLPHY
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.05%
HRNNF - CLPHY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KEP - CLPHY
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.45%
More