CKISY
Price
$32.47
Change
-$0.33 (-1.01%)
Updated
Jul 10 closing price
Capitalization
16.88B
59 days until earnings call
CLPHF
Price
$8.45
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
21.05B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CKISY vs CLPHF

Header iconCKISY vs CLPHF Comparison
Open Charts CKISY vs CLPHFBanner chart's image
CK Infrastructure Holdings
Price$32.47
Change-$0.33 (-1.01%)
Volume$615
Capitalization16.88B
CLP Holdings
Price$8.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.7K
Capitalization21.05B
CKISY vs CLPHF Comparison Chart in %
CKISY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CKISY vs. CLPHF commentary
Oct 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CKISY is a Hold and CLPHF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CKISY: $32.00 vs. CLPHF: $8.45)
Brand notoriety: CKISY and CLPHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CKISY: 100% vs. CLPHF: 128%
Market capitalization -- CKISY: $16.88B vs. CLPHF: $21.05B
CKISY [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $16.88B. CLPHF’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $21.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $164.87B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $22.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CKISY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCLPHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CKISY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CLPHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CKISY is a better buy in the long-term than CLPHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CKISY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLPHF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CKISY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CLPHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLPHF is a better buy in the short-term than CKISY.

Price Growth

CKISY (@Electric Utilities) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CLPHF (@Electric Utilities) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

CKISY is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+0.70% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLPHF($21B) has a higher market cap than CKISY($16.9B). CKISY (14.83) and CLPHF (14.55) have similar P/E ratio . CKISY YTD gains are higher at: 8.641 vs. CLPHF (5.625). CLPHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 26.4B vs. CKISY (10B). CLPHF has higher revenues than CKISY: CLPHF (89.7B) vs CKISY (4.72B).
CKISYCLPHFCKISY / CLPHF
Capitalization16.9B21B80%
EBITDA10B26.4B38%
Gain YTD8.6415.625154%
P/E Ratio14.8314.55102%
Revenue4.72B89.7B5%
Total CashN/A3.02B-
Total DebtN/A65.6B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CKISY vs CLPHF: Fundamental Ratings
CKISY
CLPHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9649
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
28100
SMR RATING
1..100
98100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5257
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4889
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CKISY's Valuation (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLPHF (94). This means that CKISY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLPHF’s over the last 12 months.

CKISY's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLPHF (100). This means that CKISY’s stock grew significantly faster than CLPHF’s over the last 12 months.

CKISY's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPHF (100). This means that CKISY’s stock grew similarly to CLPHF’s over the last 12 months.

CKISY's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPHF (57). This means that CKISY’s stock grew similarly to CLPHF’s over the last 12 months.

CKISY's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLPHF (89). This means that CKISY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLPHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CKISYCLPHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CKISY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DDWM42.210.31
+0.74%
WisdomTree Dynamic International Eq ETF
VV309.24-0.01
N/A
Vanguard Large-Cap ETF
BSMP24.52N/A
N/A
Invesco BulletShares 2025 Muncpl Bd ETF
GHTA31.12-0.03
-0.11%
Goose Hollow Tactical Allocation ETF
THRO37.81-0.13
-0.34%
iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation ActiveETF

CKISY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CKISY and CLPHF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CKISY and CLPHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CKISY
1D Price
Change %
CKISY100%
N/A
CLPHF - CKISY
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLPHY - CKISY
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
CKISF - CKISY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A

CLPHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLPHF and CKISY have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLPHF and CKISY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLPHF
1D Price
Change %
CLPHF100%
N/A
CKISY - CLPHF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLPHY - CLPHF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
CKISF - CLPHF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A