CLB
Price
$12.58
Change
-$0.07 (-0.55%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
797.03M
34 days until earnings call
PSYTF
Price
$9.46
Change
+$0.09 (+0.96%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
799.65M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLB vs PSYTF

Header iconCLB vs PSYTF Comparison
Open Charts CLB vs PSYTFBanner chart's image
Core Laboratories
Price$12.58
Change-$0.07 (-0.55%)
Volume$737.66K
Capitalization797.03M
Pason Systems
Price$9.46
Change+$0.09 (+0.96%)
Volume$12.68K
Capitalization799.65M
CLB vs PSYTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLB vs. PSYTF commentary
Jun 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLB is a Buy and PSYTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CLB: $12.58 vs. PSYTF: $9.47)
Brand notoriety: CLB and PSYTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLB: 151% vs. PSYTF: 42%
Market capitalization -- CLB: $797.03M vs. PSYTF: $799.65M
CLB [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $797.03M. PSYTF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $799.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLB’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePSYTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PSYTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PSYTF is a better buy in the long-term than CLB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CLB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CLB (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +2.61% price change this week, while PSYTF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was -0.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +4.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLB is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+4.41% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSYTF($800M) and CLB($797M) have the same market capitalization . CLB has higher P/E ratio than PSYTF: CLB (33.59) vs PSYTF (8.88). PSYTF YTD gains are higher at: 0.949 vs. CLB (-27.222). PSYTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 168M vs. CLB (65M). PSYTF has less debt than CLB: PSYTF (13.2M) vs CLB (235M). CLB has higher revenues than PSYTF: CLB (503M) vs PSYTF (359M).
CLBPSYTFCLB / PSYTF
Capitalization797M800M100%
EBITDA65M168M39%
Gain YTD-27.2220.949-2,868%
P/E Ratio33.598.88378%
Revenue503M359M140%
Total CashN/A185M-
Total Debt235M13.2M1,780%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLB vs PSYTF: Fundamental Ratings
CLB
PSYTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
931
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10051
SMR RATING
1..100
6355
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6351
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9117
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PSYTF's Valuation (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CLB (69) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that PSYTF’s stock grew similarly to CLB’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLB (100) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that PSYTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLB’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as CLB (63) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that PSYTF’s stock grew similarly to CLB’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as CLB (63) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that PSYTF’s stock grew similarly to CLB’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLB (91) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that PSYTF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MESA0.950.03
+2.97%
Mesa Air Group
R151.490.83
+0.55%
Ryder System
NESR6.27N/A
N/A
National Energy Services Reunited Corp
ROP555.75-9.91
-1.75%
Roper Technologies
CMCO14.53-0.35
-2.35%
Columbus McKinnon Corp

PSYTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSYTF and NINE have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSYTF and NINE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSYTF
1D Price
Change %
PSYTF100%
N/A
NINE - PSYTF
23%
Poorly correlated
+49.20%
PUMP - PSYTF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
CLB - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
ACDC - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
-8.64%
XPRO - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
More