Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FFAMX
CLBCX vs FFAMX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FFAMX
CLBCX vs FFAMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FFAMX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Hold and FFAMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FFAMX (10.9B). FFAMX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: FFAMX (1.91) vs CLBCX (1.10). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FFAMX: CLBCX (24 years) vs FFAMX (20 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FFAMX (0.85). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFAMX (25.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBCX: FFAMX (0) vs CLBCX (250). CLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.05 vs. FFAMX (11.99). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.04 vs. FFAMX (16.72).
| CLBCX | FFAMX | CLBCX / FFAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.82 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.85 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.288 | 7.855 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 10.9B | 2,642% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.91 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.05 | 11.99 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.45 | 32.20 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.04 | 16.72 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.72 | 63.76 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement