Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FFAMX
CLBCX vs FFAMX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FFAMX
CLBCX vs FFAMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FFAMX commentary
Sep 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Hold and FFAMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FFAMX (10.9B). FFAMX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: FFAMX (1.82) vs CLBCX (1.08). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FFAMX: CLBCX (25 years) vs FFAMX (20 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FFAMX (0.85). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFAMX (25.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBCX: FFAMX (0) vs CLBCX (250). FFAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.37 vs. CLBCX (6.90). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.92 vs. FFAMX (15.72).
| CLBCX | FFAMX | CLBCX / FFAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.82 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.85 | 159% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.450 | 9.090 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 10.9B | 2,615% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.82 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.90 | 7.37 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.71 | 34.03 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.92 | 15.72 | 184% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.06 | 59.85 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement