Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBFX vs FFAMX
CLBFX vs FFAMX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs FFAMX
CLBFX vs FFAMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. FFAMX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Hold and FFAMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FFAMX (10.9B). CLBFX (1.92) and FFAMX (1.91) have matching dividends . CLBFX was incepted earlier than FFAMX: CLBFX (24 years) vs FFAMX (20 years). FFAMX (0.85) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFAMX (25.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBFX: FFAMX (0) vs CLBFX (250). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.12 vs. FFAMX (13.84). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.63 vs. FFAMX (19.33).
| CLBFX | FFAMX | CLBFX / FFAMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.82 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.85 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.827 | 8.963 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 10.9B | 2,642% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.92 | 1.91 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.12 | 13.84 | 124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.56 | 26.80 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.63 | 19.33 | 210% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.19 | 64.33 | 160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers