Ad is loading...
CLBFX vs MTRCX
CLBFX vs MTRCX Comparison
Open Charts CLBFX vs MTRCX
American Funds American Balanced 529F
Price$34.25
Change+$0.09 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets233.54B
MFS Total Return C
Price$19.57
Change+$0.07 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.73B
CLBFX vs MTRCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBFX vs. MTRCX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBFX is a Buy and MTRCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. MTRCX (7.73B). CLBFX pays higher dividends than MTRCX: CLBFX (2.14) vs MTRCX (1.53). CLBFX was incepted earlier than MTRCX: CLBFX (23 years) vs MTRCX (31 years). MTRCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.68). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. MTRCX (53.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MTRCX: CLBFX (250) vs MTRCX (1000). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.45 vs. MTRCX (-0.30). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 53.24 vs. MTRCX (23.04).
| CLBFX | MTRCX | CLBFX / MTRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.47 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.47 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.466 | 2.400 | 19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 234B | 7.73B | 3,029% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.14 | 1.53 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.45 | -0.30 | -1,478% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.15 | -1.35 | -1,045% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.24 | 23.04 | 231% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.95 | 20.21 | 336% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...