It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CLBK’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileEVBN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CLBK’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EVBN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
CLBK (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.38% price change this week, while EVBN (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.05% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.
CLBK is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.
EVBN is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
CLBK | EVBN | CLBK / EVBN | |
Capitalization | 1.77B | 159M | 1,116% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -5.550 | 42.818 | -13% |
P/E Ratio | 48.31 | 6.55 | 737% |
Revenue | 233M | 94.1M | 248% |
Total Cash | N/A | 17.8M | - |
Total Debt | 1.53B | 180M | 849% |
CLBK | EVBN | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 95 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 99 Overvalued | 61 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 43 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 25 | 41 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
EVBN's Valuation (61) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLBK (99) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that EVBN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLBK’s over the last 12 months.
EVBN's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CLBK (75) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that EVBN’s stock grew similarly to CLBK’s over the last 12 months.
CLBK's SMR Rating (25) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as EVBN (41) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CLBK’s stock grew similarly to EVBN’s over the last 12 months.
EVBN's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CLBK (48) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that EVBN’s stock grew similarly to CLBK’s over the last 12 months.
CLBK's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as EVBN (17) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CLBK’s stock grew similarly to EVBN’s over the last 12 months.
CLBK | EVBN | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago48% | 3 days ago44% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago61% | 3 days ago58% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago60% | 3 days ago70% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago50% | 3 days ago72% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago61% | 3 days ago47% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago57% | 3 days ago62% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago53% | 7 days ago64% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago65% | 3 days ago47% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | 3 days ago52% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago61% | 3 days ago66% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLBK has been closely correlated with THFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLBK jumps, then THFF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CLBK | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CLBK | 100% | -2.04% | ||
THFF - CLBK | 80% Closely correlated | -1.25% | ||
UBSI - CLBK | 79% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
BUSE - CLBK | 78% Closely correlated | -0.90% | ||
NWBI - CLBK | 78% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
CTBI - CLBK | 78% Closely correlated | -0.56% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EVBN has been closely correlated with FCBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EVBN jumps, then FCBC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EVBN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
EVBN | 100% | -1.19% | ||
FCBC - EVBN | 66% Closely correlated | -0.91% | ||
CCNE - EVBN | 66% Closely correlated | -1.11% | ||
IBCP - EVBN | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
CLBK - EVBN | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.04% | ||
FMBH - EVBN | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.08% | ||
More |