CLCFF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 8 closing price
Capitalization
8.96M
SHIEF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.01 (-9.09%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
109.05M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLCFF vs SHIEF

Header iconCLCFF vs SHIEF Comparison
Open Charts CLCFF vs SHIEFBanner chart's image
Christina Lake Cannabis
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$29K
Capitalization8.96M
Shield Therapeutics
Price$0.10
Change-$0.01 (-9.09%)
Volume$10.01K
Capitalization109.05M
CLCFF vs SHIEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHIEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLCFF vs. SHIEF commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLCFF is a Hold and SHIEF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (CLCFF: $0.03 vs. SHIEF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: CLCFF and SHIEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLCFF: 79% vs. SHIEF: 103%
Market capitalization -- CLCFF: $8.96M vs. SHIEF: $109.05M
CLCFF [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] is valued at $8.96M. SHIEF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] market capitalization is $109.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry ranges from $67.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Generic] industry is $3.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLCFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHIEF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLCFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SHIEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLCFF is a better buy in the long-term than SHIEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLCFF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHIEF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLCFF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SHIEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLCFF is a better buy in the short-term than SHIEF.

Price Growth

CLCFF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) experienced а +10.78% price change this week, while SHIEF (@Pharmaceuticals: Generic) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Generic industry was +1.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +52.06%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Generic (+1.50% weekly)

A generic drug contains the same chemical substance as a drug that was originally protected by patents. Generic drugs are generally sold at cheaper price points, compared to name-brand pharmaceuticals, after patents for the more expensive drugs lapse. The generic drug industry has created a major market, thanks to the lower pricing. According to the Center for Justice and Democracy at New York Law School, 80 percent of all drugs prescribed are generic, and generic drugs are chosen 94 percent of the time when they are available. But their manufacturers must be able to prove to the FDA that they can be effective substitutes for the original drugs. Some of the major generic drug makers include Zoetis, Inc., Allergan plc and Mylan N.V.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHIEF($109M) has a higher market cap than CLCFF($8.96M). SHIEF YTD gains are higher at: 203.328 vs. CLCFF (126.000). CLCFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.25M vs. SHIEF (-12.92M). SHIEF has more cash in the bank: 10.8M vs. CLCFF (3.39M). CLCFF has less debt than SHIEF: CLCFF (8.22M) vs SHIEF (27M). SHIEF has higher revenues than CLCFF: SHIEF (41.5M) vs CLCFF (13.6M).
CLCFFSHIEFCLCFF / SHIEF
Capitalization8.96M109M8%
EBITDA3.25M-12.92M-25%
Gain YTD126.000203.32862%
P/E Ratio4.69N/A-
Revenue13.6M41.5M33%
Total Cash3.39M10.8M31%
Total Debt8.22M27M30%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SHIEF: Fundamental Ratings
SHIEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
94
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
94
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLCFFSHIEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHIEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RDUFF0.120.01
+9.09%
Radius Gold Inc.
AIOSF6.01N/A
N/A
Atresmedia Corporacion De Medios De Comunicacion SA
BYMOF91.47N/A
N/A
Bayerische Motoren Werke AG
SFGIF10.51N/A
N/A
SHIZUOKA FINL GROUP INC.
HBFGF0.85N/A
-0.45%
HAPPY BELLY FOOD GROUP INC.

CLCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLCFF and GENPF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLCFF and GENPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLCFF
1D Price
Change %
CLCFF100%
-1.60%
GENPF - CLCFF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LVZPF - CLCFF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHIEF - CLCFF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HYEX - CLCFF
3%
Poorly correlated
-10.51%
GEDSF - CLCFF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SHIEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHIEF and TLRY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHIEF and TLRY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHIEF
1D Price
Change %
SHIEF100%
N/A
TLRY - SHIEF
28%
Poorly correlated
-6.30%
CGC - SHIEF
26%
Poorly correlated
-7.19%
ACB - SHIEF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.22%
IMCC - SHIEF
25%
Poorly correlated
-6.09%
CVSI - SHIEF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
More