CLCGY
Price
$41.99
Change
-$0.38 (-0.90%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
4.99B
MSMKF
Price
$21.20
Change
+$3.10 (+17.13%)
Updated
Jul 9 closing price
Capitalization
8.24B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLCGY vs MSMKF

Header iconCLCGY vs MSMKF Comparison
Open Charts CLCGY vs MSMKFBanner chart's image
Clicks Group
Price$41.99
Change-$0.38 (-0.90%)
Volume$1.27K
Capitalization4.99B
Matsumotokiyoshi Holdings
Price$21.20
Change+$3.10 (+17.13%)
Volume$1.4K
Capitalization8.24B
CLCGY vs MSMKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLCGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSMKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLCGY vs. MSMKF commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLCGY is a Hold and MSMKF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (CLCGY: $41.99 vs. MSMKF: $21.20)
Brand notoriety: CLCGY and MSMKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Drugstore Chains industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLCGY: 52% vs. MSMKF: 115%
Market capitalization -- CLCGY: $5.05B vs. MSMKF: $8.31B
CLCGY [@Drugstore Chains] is valued at $5.05B. MSMKF’s [@Drugstore Chains] market capitalization is $8.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Drugstore Chains] industry ranges from $25.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Drugstore Chains] industry is $3.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLCGY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMSMKF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLCGY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MSMKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLCGY is a better buy in the long-term than MSMKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLCGY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MSMKF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLCGY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MSMKF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MSMKF is a better buy in the short-term than CLCGY.

Price Growth

CLCGY (@Drugstore Chains) experienced а -2.20% price change this week, while MSMKF (@Drugstore Chains) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Drugstore Chains industry was +1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.63%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Drugstore Chains (+1.89% weekly)

The drugstore chains industry includes stores that sell medicines (both prescription and non-prescription), health, beauty and personal care products. Over time, many pharmacy retail chains have launched their own pharmacy benefits management services. Since demand for medical products is typically less sensitive to economic cycles, drugstore retail chains industry could be largely considered as non-cyclical. CVS Health Corporation, Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. and Rite Aid Corporation are some of the biggest operators in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSMKF($8.24B) has a higher market cap than CLCGY($4.99B). CLCGY has higher P/E ratio than MSMKF: CLCGY (29.40) vs MSMKF (23.34). MSMKF YTD gains are higher at: 53.623 vs. CLCGY (8.636). MSMKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 104B vs. CLCGY (6.31B). MSMKF has higher revenues than CLCGY: MSMKF (1.04T) vs CLCGY (46.8B).
CLCGYMSMKFCLCGY / MSMKF
Capitalization4.99B8.24B61%
EBITDA6.31B104B6%
Gain YTD8.63653.62316%
P/E Ratio29.4023.34126%
Revenue46.8B1.04T5%
Total CashN/A113B-
Total DebtN/A19.5B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLCGY vs MSMKF: Fundamental Ratings
CLCGY
MSMKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6148
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
45100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5445
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5027

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MSMKF's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as CLCGY (97). This means that MSMKF’s stock grew similarly to CLCGY’s over the last 12 months.

CLCGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MSMKF (100). This means that CLCGY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MSMKF’s over the last 12 months.

CLCGY's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MSMKF (100). This means that CLCGY’s stock grew similarly to MSMKF’s over the last 12 months.

MSMKF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CLCGY (54). This means that MSMKF’s stock grew similarly to CLCGY’s over the last 12 months.

MSMKF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CLCGY (100). This means that MSMKF’s stock grew similarly to CLCGY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLCGYMSMKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
50%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLCGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MSMKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EWP48.020.36
+0.76%
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
AVIE62.310.45
+0.72%
Avantis Inflation Focused Equity ETF
ENZL44.870.20
+0.45%
iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF
KHPI25.720.07
+0.27%
Kensington Hedged Premium Income ETF
BGIG31.420.03
+0.11%
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth ETF

CLCGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLCGY and WBA have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLCGY and WBA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLCGY
1D Price
Change %
CLCGY100%
-0.90%
WBA - CLCGY
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RDGT - CLCGY
4%
Poorly correlated
+3.06%
ALBHF - CLCGY
4%
Poorly correlated
-9.84%
MSMKF - CLCGY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HEWA - CLCGY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MSMKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MSMKF and HITI have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MSMKF and HITI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MSMKF
1D Price
Change %
MSMKF100%
N/A
HITI - MSMKF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.83%
CLCGY - MSMKF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
ALBBY - MSMKF
0%
Poorly correlated
-5.08%
HEWA - MSMKF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WBA - MSMKF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More