CLCMF
Price
$2.87
Change
+$0.97 (+51.05%)
Updated
Mar 28 closing price
Capitalization
2.64B
FYBR
Price
$37.11
Change
+$0.03 (+0.08%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
9.29B
73 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLCMF vs FYBR

Header iconCLCMF vs FYBR Comparison
Open Charts CLCMF vs FYBRBanner chart's image
Sinch AB
Price$2.87
Change+$0.97 (+51.05%)
Volume$75
Capitalization2.64B
Frontier Communications Parent
Price$37.11
Change+$0.03 (+0.08%)
Volume$3.1M
Capitalization9.29B
CLCMF vs FYBR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FYBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLCMF vs. FYBR commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLCMF is a Hold and FYBR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CLCMF: $2.87 vs. FYBR: $37.11)
Brand notoriety: CLCMF and FYBR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLCMF: 100% vs. FYBR: 123%
Market capitalization -- CLCMF: $2.64B vs. FYBR: $9.29B
CLCMF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $2.64B. FYBR’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $9.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $286.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.82B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLCMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFYBR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLCMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FYBR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FYBR is a better buy in the long-term than CLCMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FYBR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FYBR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CLCMF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FYBR (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +1.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

FYBR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (+1.92% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FYBR($9.29B) has a higher market cap than CLCMF($2.64B). FYBR has higher P/E ratio than CLCMF: FYBR (253.14) vs CLCMF (134.09). CLCMF YTD gains are higher at: 50.947 vs. FYBR (6.945). CLCMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.01B vs. FYBR (2.11B). CLCMF has more cash in the bank: 717M vs. FYBR (412M). CLCMF has less debt than FYBR: CLCMF (5.96B) vs FYBR (11.9B). CLCMF has higher revenues than FYBR: CLCMF (28.5B) vs FYBR (5.98B).
CLCMFFYBRCLCMF / FYBR
Capitalization2.64B9.29B28%
EBITDA3.01B2.11B142%
Gain YTD50.9476.945734%
P/E Ratio134.09253.1453%
Revenue28.5B5.98B477%
Total Cash717M412M174%
Total Debt5.96B11.9B50%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLCMF: Fundamental Ratings
CLCMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLCMFFYBR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FYBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CVMRX20.710.02
+0.10%
Calvert Emerging Markets Equity R6
BALFX37.42-0.08
-0.21%
American Funds American Balanced F1
VYMYX19.72-0.11
-0.55%
Voya MI Dynamic SMID Cap W
FCPVX20.93-0.13
-0.62%
Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund
GLEIX13.69-0.09
-0.65%
GS Energy Infrastructure Fd Inv Shares

CLCMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLCMF and TIAOF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLCMF and TIAOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLCMF
1D Price
Change %
CLCMF100%
N/A
TIAOF - CLCMF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FYBR - CLCMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
CGEAF - CLCMF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVHSY - CLCMF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BGAOY - CLCMF
1%
Poorly correlated
+4.32%
More

FYBR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYBR has been loosely correlated with S. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FYBR jumps, then S could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FYBR
1D Price
Change %
FYBR100%
+0.08%
S - FYBR
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.39%
CHTR - FYBR
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.75%
CMCSA - FYBR
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
ASTS - FYBR
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
AD - FYBR
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
More