CLCMF
Price
$3.02
Change
+$0.02 (+0.67%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
FYBR
Price
$34.66
Change
-$0.17 (-0.49%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
64 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CLCMF vs FYBR

Header iconCLCMF vs FYBR Comparison
Open Charts CLCMF vs FYBRBanner chart's image
Sinch AB
Price$3.02
Change+$0.02 (+0.67%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Frontier Communications Parent
Price$34.66
Change-$0.17 (-0.49%)
Volume$4.7M
CapitalizationN/A
CLCMF vs FYBR Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FYBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLCMF vs. FYBR commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLCMF is a Buy and FYBR is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CLCMF: $3.02 vs. FYBR: $34.66)
Brand notoriety: CLCMF and FYBR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLCMF: 13% vs. FYBR: 139%
Market capitalization -- CLCMF: $2.19B vs. FYBR: $6.02B
CLCMF [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $2.19B. FYBR’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $6.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLCMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFYBR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLCMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FYBR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FYBR is a better buy in the long-term than CLCMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLCMF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FYBR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLCMF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FYBR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FYBR is a better buy in the short-term than CLCMF.

Price Growth

CLCMF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а +0.67% price change this week, while FYBR (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was +0.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was -0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +84.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

FYBR is expected to report earnings on Feb 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (-0.42% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FYBR($6.02B) has a higher market cap than CLCMF($2.19B). FYBR has higher P/E ratio than CLCMF: FYBR (199.42) vs CLCMF (35.12). FYBR YTD gains are higher at: 36.780 vs. CLCMF (21.774). CLCMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.63B vs. FYBR (2.19B). FYBR has more cash in the bank: 2.2B vs. CLCMF (1.55B). CLCMF (11B) and FYBR (11.3B) have identical debt. CLCMF has higher revenues than FYBR: CLCMF (28.5B) vs FYBR (5.68B).
CLCMFFYBRCLCMF / FYBR
Capitalization2.19B6.02B36%
EBITDA2.63B2.19B120%
Gain YTD21.77436.78059%
P/E Ratio35.12199.4218%
Revenue28.5B5.68B502%
Total Cash1.55B2.2B70%
Total Debt11B11.3B97%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLCMF: Fundamental Ratings
CLCMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
43
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLCMFFYBR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
29%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLCMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FYBR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XJUL35.35-0.29
-0.81%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Enh & ModBufETF-Jul
NOCT51.37-0.69
-1.33%
Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buff ETF™ Oct
LRND34.26-0.78
-2.23%
NYLI U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF
SCHC33.94-0.82
-2.36%
Schwab International Small-Cap Eq ETF™
FDRR51.44-1.29
-2.44%
Fidelity Dividend ETF for Rising Rates

CLCMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLCMF and TIAOF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLCMF and TIAOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLCMF
1D Price
Change %
CLCMF100%
N/A
TIAOF - CLCMF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FYBR - CLCMF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
CGEAF - CLCMF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVHSY - CLCMF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BGAOY - CLCMF
1%
Poorly correlated
+4.86%
More

FYBR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FYBR has been loosely correlated with S. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FYBR jumps, then S could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FYBR
1D Price
Change %
FYBR100%
-0.49%
S - FYBR
50%
Loosely correlated
-7.82%
ATUS - FYBR
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.96%
CHTR - FYBR
32%
Poorly correlated
-3.44%
CMCSA - FYBR
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.42%
LUMN - FYBR
30%
Poorly correlated
-3.34%
More