CLDHF
Price
$0.58
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
981.54M
FRLOF
Price
$0.70
Change
+$0.01 (+1.45%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
2.55B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLDHF vs FRLOF

Header iconCLDHF vs FRLOF Comparison
Open Charts CLDHF vs FRLOFBanner chart's image
Retail China Tr
Price$0.58
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.33K
Capitalization981.54M
FRASERS LOGISTICS & Commercial Trust
Price$0.70
Change+$0.01 (+1.45%)
Volume$294
Capitalization2.55B
CLDHF vs FRLOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLDHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRLOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLDHF vs. FRLOF commentary
Aug 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLDHF is a Hold and FRLOF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 13, 2025
Stock price -- (CLDHF: $0.58 vs. FRLOF: $0.70)
Brand notoriety: CLDHF and FRLOF are both not notable
CLDHF represents the Real Estate Investment Trusts, while FRLOF is part of the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLDHF: 33% vs. FRLOF: 4%
Market capitalization -- CLDHF: $981.54M vs. FRLOF: $2.55B
CLDHF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $981.54M. FRLOF’s [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] market capitalization is $2.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] industry ranges from $97.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $6.27B. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Manufacturing] industry is $7.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLDHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRLOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLDHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FRLOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLDHF is a better buy in the long-term than FRLOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLDHF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRLOF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLDHF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • FRLOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRLOF is a better buy in the short-term than CLDHF.

Price Growth

CLDHF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FRLOF (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) price change was +1.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.98%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry was -0.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.50%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.01% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

@Miscellaneous Manufacturing (-0.98% weekly)

Miscellaneous manufacturing refers to a diverse range of products that cannot readily be categorized into other specific sectors of manufacturing. Major U.S. players in this industry include AMETEK, Inc.( analytical instruments, precision components and specialty materials), Dover Corporation (solutions for efficiency and safety of extracting oil and gas, e.g. rod lifts, progressing cavity pumps, gas lifts etc.; solutions for the transportation/transformation of solid waste; products for safe handling of critical fluids for various industries; systems for commercial-refrigeration, heating and cooling, and food and beverage packaging), and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (niche markets including commercial roofing, energy, lawn and garden, mining and construction equipment, aerospace and electronics, dining and food delivery, and healthcare), among others.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRLOF($2.55B) has a higher market cap than CLDHF($982M). CLDHF has higher P/E ratio than FRLOF: CLDHF (7451.03) vs FRLOF (25.32). CLDHF YTD gains are higher at: 10.555 vs. FRLOF (3.958). FRLOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 269M vs. CLDHF (141M). CLDHF has more cash in the bank: 241M vs. FRLOF (132M). CLDHF has less debt than FRLOF: CLDHF (1.82B) vs FRLOF (2.61B). FRLOF has higher revenues than CLDHF: FRLOF (463M) vs CLDHF (328M).
CLDHFFRLOFCLDHF / FRLOF
Capitalization982M2.55B38%
EBITDA141M269M52%
Gain YTD10.5553.958267%
P/E Ratio7451.0325.3229,432%
Revenue328M463M71%
Total Cash241M132M183%
Total Debt1.82B2.61B70%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLDHFFRLOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
6%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
2%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLDHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRLOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARTLX15.310.22
+1.46%
Artisan Value Investor
DOMOX10.750.12
+1.13%
Domini Impact International Equity Instl
MSALX24.28N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Intl Advtg L
ATGYX46.82N/A
N/A
Cantor Fitzgerald Equity Opp Inst
JVMRX28.90N/A
N/A
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6

CLDHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLDHF and ARLLF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLDHF and ARLLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLDHF
1D Price
Change %
CLDHF100%
N/A
ARLLF - CLDHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SGIC - CLDHF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JRFIF - CLDHF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NLCP - CLDHF
-5%
Poorly correlated
+2.25%
FRLOF - CLDHF
-18%
Poorly correlated
+1.19%
More

FRLOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRLOF and CGIUF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRLOF and CGIUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRLOF
1D Price
Change %
FRLOF100%
+1.19%
CGIUF - FRLOF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHTH - FRLOF
11%
Poorly correlated
+3.75%
PECO - FRLOF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
SGIC - FRLOF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARLLF - FRLOF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More