Ad is loading...
CLDHF
Price
$0.58
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 8 closing price
KPDCF
Price
$1.75
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Ad is loading...

CLDHF vs KPDCF

Header iconCLDHF vs KPDCF Comparison
Open Charts CLDHF vs KPDCFBanner chart's image
Retail China Tr
Price$0.58
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$800
CapitalizationN/A
Keppel DC Reit Mgmt Pte
Price$1.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
CLDHF vs KPDCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLDHF vs. KPDCF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLDHF is a Hold and KPDCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CLDHF: $0.58 vs. KPDCF: $1.75)
Brand notoriety: CLDHF and KPDCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLDHF: 100% vs. KPDCF: 23%
Market capitalization -- CLDHF: $1.32B vs. KPDCF: $2.8B
CLDHF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $1.32B. KPDCF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $2.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLDHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKPDCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLDHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KPDCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CLDHF and KPDCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

CLDHF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KPDCF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -2.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-2.01% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KPDCF($2.8B) has a higher market cap than CLDHF($1.32B). CLDHF has higher P/E ratio than KPDCF: CLDHF (18.62) vs KPDCF (16.50). KPDCF YTD gains are higher at: 25.000 vs. CLDHF (-0.051). CLDHF (304M) and KPDCF (291M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . CLDHF has more cash in the bank: 253M vs. KPDCF (140M). KPDCF has less debt than CLDHF: KPDCF (1.46B) vs CLDHF (1.97B). CLDHF has higher revenues than KPDCF: CLDHF (368M) vs KPDCF (282M).
CLDHFKPDCFCLDHF / KPDCF
Capitalization1.32B2.8B47%
EBITDA304M291M104%
Gain YTD-0.05125.000-0%
P/E Ratio18.6216.50113%
Revenue368M282M130%
Total Cash253M140M181%
Total Debt1.97B1.46B135%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JVAYX43.11-0.03
-0.07%
JPMorgan Value Advantage R6
TWQAX15.25-0.09
-0.59%
Transamerica Large Cap Value A
TVOYX40.15-0.35
-0.86%
Touchstone Small Cap Value Y
GTLIX25.46-0.41
-1.58%
Glenmede Quant US Large Cap Core EqInstl
RSCCX9.84-0.21
-2.09%
Victory RS Small Cap Equity C

CLDHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLDHF has been closely correlated with IVREF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLDHF jumps, then IVREF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLDHF
1D Price
Change %
CLDHF100%
N/A
IVREF - CLDHF
80%
Closely correlated
N/A
KPDCF - CLDHF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LVPR - CLDHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GWWTF - CLDHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARLLF - CLDHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KPDCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KPDCF and CLDHF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KPDCF and CLDHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KPDCF
1D Price
Change %
KPDCF100%
N/A
CLDHF - KPDCF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LVVR - KPDCF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVREF - KPDCF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LKREF - KPDCF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LDSCY - KPDCF
6%
Poorly correlated
+7.77%
More