CLDX
Price
$31.43
Change
-$0.40 (-1.26%)
Updated
Dec 8, 6:59 PM EST
88 days until earnings call
HOWL
Price
$2.90
Change
-$0.02 (-0.68%)
Updated
Dec 8, 6:59 PM EST
102 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Compare trend and price CLDX vs HOWL

Header iconCLDX vs HOWL Comparison
Open Charts CLDX vs HOWLBanner chart's image
Celldex Therapeutics
Price$31.43
Change-$0.40 (-1.26%)
Volume$186.88K
CapitalizationN/A
Werewolf Therapeutics
Price$2.90
Change-$0.02 (-0.68%)
Volume$20.66K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CLDX vs HOWL Comparison Chart

Loading...

Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
VS
CLDX vs. HOWL commentary
Dec 10, 2023

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLDX is a Hold and HOWL is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 10, 2023
Stock price -- (CLDX: $31.43 vs. HOWL: $2.90)
Brand notoriety: CLDX and HOWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLDX: 42% vs. HOWL: 3%
Market capitalization -- CLDX: $1.6B vs. HOWL: $91.2M
CLDX [@Biotechnology] is valued at $1.6B. HOWL’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $91.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $464.61B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLDX’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHOWL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLDX’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HOWL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CLDX and HOWL are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLDX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HOWL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLDX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HOWL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CLDX and HOWL are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CLDX (@Biotechnology) experienced а -1.84% price change this week, while HOWL (@Biotechnology) price change was +13.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was +10161.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLDX is expected to report earnings on Mar 07, 2024.

HOWL is expected to report earnings on Mar 21, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (+10161.68% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for CLDX with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for HOWL with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLDX($1.6B) has a higher market cap than HOWL($91.2M). HOWL YTD gains are higher at: 41.463 vs. CLDX (-29.482). HOWL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -39M vs. CLDX (-131.88M). CLDX has more cash in the bank: 235M vs. HOWL (130M). CLDX has less debt than HOWL: CLDX (2.85M) vs HOWL (52.2M). HOWL has higher revenues than CLDX: HOWL (25.7M) vs CLDX (4.37M).
CLDXHOWLCLDX / HOWL
Capitalization1.6B91.2M1,750%
EBITDA-131.88M-39M338%
Gain YTD-29.48241.463-71%
P/E RatioN/A0.39-
Revenue4.37M25.7M17%
Total Cash235M130M181%
Total Debt2.85M52.2M5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLDX: Fundamental Ratings
CLDX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLDXHOWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HWLIX38.600.38
+0.99%
Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value I
OANWX20.550.14
+0.69%
Oakmark Global Select Institutional
EGWRX14.490.09
+0.63%
Allspring Discovery Small Cap Gr R6
FEIFX28.720.12
+0.42%
Franklin Equity Income Adv
DMGGF0.30-0.01
-4.25%
DMG Blockchain Solutions

CLDX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLDX has been loosely correlated with MDGL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLDX jumps, then MDGL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLDX
1D Price
Change %
CLDX100%
-1.26%
MDGL - CLDX
49%
Loosely correlated
-11.58%
AXON - CLDX
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
ICPT - CLDX
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ORMP - CLDX
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
COGT - CLDX
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.48%
More

HOWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HOWL and EDIT have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HOWL and EDIT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HOWL
1D Price
Change %
HOWL100%
-0.85%
EDIT - HOWL
33%
Poorly correlated
-3.58%
FOLD - HOWL
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.18%
FATE - HOWL
31%
Poorly correlated
-4.68%
BEAM - HOWL
30%
Poorly correlated
-8.17%
AMTI - HOWL
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.33%
More