CLF
Price
$17.57
Change
-$0.15 (-0.85%)
Updated
May 21, 10:02 AM (EDT)
59 days until earnings call
GGB
Price
$3.77
Change
+$0.03 (+0.80%)
Updated
May 21, 10:10 AM (EDT)
71 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CLF vs GGB

Header iconCLF vs GGB Comparison
Open Charts CLF vs GGBBanner chart's image
Cleveland-Cliffs
Price$17.57
Change-$0.15 (-0.85%)
Volume$2.3K
CapitalizationN/A
Gerdau SA
Price$3.77
Change+$0.03 (+0.80%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CLF vs GGB Comparison Chart

Loading...

CLFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
GGBDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
CLF vs. GGB commentary
May 21, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLF is a Hold and GGB is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
May 21, 2024
Stock price -- (CLF: $17.51 vs. GGB: $3.84)
Brand notoriety: CLF: Notable vs. GGB: Not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLF: 61% vs. GGB: 54%
Market capitalization -- CLF: $8.33B vs. GGB: $7.69B
CLF [@Steel] is valued at $8.33B. GGB’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $7.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $41.27B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $5.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGGB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GGB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GGB is a better buy in the long-term than CLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GGB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GGB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLF is a better buy in the short-term than GGB.

Price Growth

CLF (@Steel) experienced а +1.10% price change this week, while GGB (@Steel) price change was +4.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLF is expected to report earnings on Jul 19, 2024.

GGB is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+0.49% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for CLF with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for GGB with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLF($8.33B) has a higher market cap than GGB($7.69B). CLF has higher P/E ratio than GGB: CLF (23.61) vs GGB (6.21). CLF YTD gains are higher at: -14.251 vs. GGB (-20.467).
CLFGGBCLF / GGB
Capitalization8.33B7.69B108%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-14.251-20.46770%
P/E Ratio23.616.21380%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3.14BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLF vs GGB: Fundamental Ratings
CLF
GGB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
323
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6046
SMR RATING
1..100
8456
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6162
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2623
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GGB's Valuation (3) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLF (58). This means that GGB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

GGB's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the Steel industry is in the same range as CLF (60). This means that GGB’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

GGB's SMR Rating (56) in the Steel industry is in the same range as CLF (84). This means that GGB’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

CLF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Steel industry is in the same range as GGB (62). This means that CLF’s stock grew similarly to GGB’s over the last 12 months.

GGB's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Steel industry is in the same range as CLF (26). This means that GGB’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLFGGB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
GGBDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CURE119.100.58
+0.49%
Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3X ETF
SPMD52.950.11
+0.21%
SPDR® Portfolio S&P 400 Mid Cap ETF
FJAN42.590.08
+0.20%
FT Cboe Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Jan
ADPV31.340.06
+0.18%
Adaptiv™ Select ETF
RHRX14.74-0.04
-0.27%
RH Tactical Rotation ETF

CLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLF has been closely correlated with NUE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLF jumps, then NUE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLF
1D Price
Change %
CLF100%
-0.91%
NUE - CLF
70%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
STLD - CLF
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
MT - CLF
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
X - CLF
53%
Loosely correlated
-3.86%
RS - CLF
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
More

GGB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GGB has been loosely correlated with SID. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GGB jumps, then SID could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GGB
1D Price
Change %
GGB100%
-3.27%
SID - GGB
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.47%
MT - GGB
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
ATI - GGB
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
CLF - GGB
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.91%
HAYN - GGB
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
More