CLF
Price
$8.76
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
4.36B
17 days until earnings call
LIFZF
Price
$20.86
Change
-$0.02 (-0.10%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.32B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLF vs LIFZF

Header iconCLF vs LIFZF Comparison
Open Charts CLF vs LIFZFBanner chart's image
Cleveland-Cliffs
Price$8.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$651.07K
Capitalization4.36B
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty
Price$20.86
Change-$0.02 (-0.10%)
Volume$18.7K
Capitalization1.32B
CLF vs LIFZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIFZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLF vs. LIFZF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLF is a StrongBuy and LIFZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CLF: $8.82 vs. LIFZF: $20.86)
Brand notoriety: CLF: Notable vs. LIFZF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLF: 75% vs. LIFZF: 15%
Market capitalization -- CLF: $4.36B vs. LIFZF: $1.32B
CLF [@Steel] is valued at $4.36B. LIFZF’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $1.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $31.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $5.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLIFZF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LIFZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LIFZF is a better buy in the long-term than CLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIFZF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LIFZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLF is a better buy in the short-term than LIFZF.

Price Growth

CLF (@Steel) experienced а +25.28% price change this week, while LIFZF (@Steel) price change was -0.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +2.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLF is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+2.31% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLF($4.36B) has a higher market cap than LIFZF($1.32B). CLF has higher P/E ratio than LIFZF: CLF (145.67) vs LIFZF (13.37). LIFZF YTD gains are higher at: 3.724 vs. CLF (-6.170). LIFZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 147M vs. CLF (-63M). CLF has more cash in the bank: 57M vs. LIFZF (19M). CLF has higher revenues than LIFZF: CLF (18.6B) vs LIFZF (187M).
CLFLIFZFCLF / LIFZF
Capitalization4.36B1.32B331%
EBITDA-63M147M-43%
Gain YTD-6.1703.724-166%
P/E Ratio145.6713.371,090%
Revenue18.6B187M9,947%
Total Cash57M19M300%
Total Debt7.6BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLF vs LIFZF: Fundamental Ratings
CLF
LIFZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2285
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9185
SMR RATING
1..100
9345
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5058
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
217
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LIFZF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLF (89) in the Steel industry. This means that LIFZF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

LIFZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as CLF (91) in the Steel industry. This means that LIFZF’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

LIFZF's SMR Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLF (93) in the Steel industry. This means that LIFZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

CLF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Steel industry is in the same range as LIFZF (58) in the null industry. This means that CLF’s stock grew similarly to LIFZF’s over the last 12 months.

CLF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Steel industry is in the same range as LIFZF (17) in the null industry. This means that CLF’s stock grew similarly to LIFZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLFLIFZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
83%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIFZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HNCAX20.15N/A
N/A
Hartford International Growth A
MARFX23.99N/A
N/A
BlackRock Mid-Cap Value Institutional
TAAGX12.65N/A
N/A
Timothy Plan Small/Mid Cap Growth Cl A
HLSCX23.62N/A
N/A
Hartford Disciplined Equity HLS IC
MIEKX39.69N/A
N/A
MFS International Equity I

CLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLF has been closely correlated with NUE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLF jumps, then NUE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLF
1D Price
Change %
CLF100%
+0.68%
NUE - CLF
75%
Closely correlated
-0.71%
STLD - CLF
74%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
CMC - CLF
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
RS - CLF
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
ZEUS - CLF
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
More

LIFZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIFZF has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIFZF jumps, then MT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIFZF
1D Price
Change %
LIFZF100%
-0.10%
MT - LIFZF
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
SID - LIFZF
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.65%
TX - LIFZF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
CLF - LIFZF
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
MSB - LIFZF
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.09%
More