CLF
Price
$6.95
Change
-$0.31 (-4.27%)
Updated
Apr 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.44B
13 days until earnings call
LIFZF
Price
$20.49
Change
-$0.08 (-0.39%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.21B
Ad is loading...

CLF vs LIFZF

Header iconCLF vs LIFZF Comparison
Open Charts CLF vs LIFZFBanner chart's image
Cleveland-Cliffs
Price$6.95
Change-$0.31 (-4.27%)
Volume$413.21K
Capitalization3.44B
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty
Price$20.49
Change-$0.08 (-0.39%)
Volume$19.32K
Capitalization1.21B
CLF vs LIFZF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIFZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLF vs. LIFZF commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLF is a Hold and LIFZF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CLF: $7.26 vs. LIFZF: $20.49)
Brand notoriety: CLF: Notable vs. LIFZF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLF: 155% vs. LIFZF: 50%
Market capitalization -- CLF: $3.44B vs. LIFZF: $1.29B
CLF [@Steel] is valued at $3.44B. LIFZF’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $1.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $25.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $4.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLIFZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LIFZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LIFZF is a better buy in the long-term than CLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIFZF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LIFZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LIFZF is a better buy in the short-term than CLF.

Price Growth

CLF (@Steel) experienced а -22.19% price change this week, while LIFZF (@Steel) price change was -2.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was -4.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLF is expected to report earnings on Apr 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (-4.19% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLF($3.44B) has a higher market cap than LIFZF($1.21B). CLF has higher P/E ratio than LIFZF: CLF (145.67) vs LIFZF (9.83). LIFZF YTD gains are higher at: 1.885 vs. CLF (-22.766). CLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 378M vs. LIFZF (163M). CLF has more cash in the bank: 54M vs. LIFZF (42.3M). CLF has higher revenues than LIFZF: CLF (19.2B) vs LIFZF (208M).
CLFLIFZFCLF / LIFZF
Capitalization3.44B1.21B285%
EBITDA378M163M232%
Gain YTD-22.7661.885-1,208%
P/E Ratio145.679.831,481%
Revenue19.2B208M9,231%
Total Cash54M42.3M128%
Total Debt7.07BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLF vs LIFZF: Fundamental Ratings
CLF
LIFZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5986
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8661
SMR RATING
1..100
9337
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8657
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
238
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LIFZF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLF (89) in the Steel industry. This means that LIFZF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

LIFZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as CLF (86) in the Steel industry. This means that LIFZF’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

LIFZF's SMR Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLF (93) in the Steel industry. This means that LIFZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

LIFZF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as CLF (86) in the Steel industry. This means that LIFZF’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

CLF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIFZF (38) in the null industry. This means that CLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LIFZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLFLIFZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIFZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DGZ7.310.20
+2.81%
DB Gold Short ETN
BSMU21.710.11
+0.53%
Invesco BulletShares 2030 Muncpl Bd ETF
DBND46.250.18
+0.39%
DoubleLine Opportunistic Core Bond ETF
NULV39.33-1.30
-3.19%
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
FDFF33.74-1.88
-5.28%
Fidelity Disruptive Finance ETF

LIFZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIFZF has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIFZF jumps, then MT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIFZF
1D Price
Change %
LIFZF100%
-0.39%
MT - LIFZF
35%
Loosely correlated
-7.29%
SID - LIFZF
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
TX - LIFZF
31%
Poorly correlated
-5.08%
CLF - LIFZF
31%
Poorly correlated
-16.84%
MSB - LIFZF
29%
Poorly correlated
-4.10%
More