CLF
Price
$11.44
Change
+$0.53 (+4.86%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
5.66B
88 days until earnings call
LIFZF
Price
$20.06
Change
-$0.49 (-2.38%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.3B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLF vs LIFZF

Header iconCLF vs LIFZF Comparison
Open Charts CLF vs LIFZFBanner chart's image
Cleveland-Cliffs
Price$11.44
Change+$0.53 (+4.86%)
Volume$28.34M
Capitalization5.66B
Labrador Iron Ore Royalty
Price$20.06
Change-$0.49 (-2.38%)
Volume$21.1K
Capitalization1.3B
CLF vs LIFZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIFZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLF vs. LIFZF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLF is a Buy and LIFZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CLF: $11.44 vs. LIFZF: $20.06)
Brand notoriety: CLF: Notable vs. LIFZF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLF: 79% vs. LIFZF: 28%
Market capitalization -- CLF: $5.66B vs. LIFZF: $1.3B
CLF [@Steel] is valued at $5.66B. LIFZF’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $1.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $33.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $5.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLIFZF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LIFZF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LIFZF is a better buy in the long-term than CLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIFZF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LIFZF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLF is a better buy in the short-term than LIFZF.

Price Growth

CLF (@Steel) experienced а +20.68% price change this week, while LIFZF (@Steel) price change was +0.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +1.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLF is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+1.65% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLF($5.66B) has a higher market cap than LIFZF($1.3B). CLF has higher P/E ratio than LIFZF: CLF (145.67) vs LIFZF (12.81). CLF YTD gains are higher at: 21.702 vs. LIFZF (-0.232). LIFZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 147M vs. CLF (-63M). CLF has more cash in the bank: 57M vs. LIFZF (19M). CLF has higher revenues than LIFZF: CLF (18.6B) vs LIFZF (187M).
CLFLIFZFCLF / LIFZF
Capitalization5.66B1.3B436%
EBITDA-63M147M-43%
Gain YTD21.702-0.232-9,346%
P/E Ratio145.6712.811,137%
Revenue18.6B187M9,947%
Total Cash57M19M300%
Total Debt7.6BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLF vs LIFZF: Fundamental Ratings
CLF
LIFZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2712
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8087
SMR RATING
1..100
9344
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3976
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
222
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LIFZF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLF (89) in the Steel industry. This means that LIFZF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

CLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Steel industry is in the same range as LIFZF (87) in the null industry. This means that CLF’s stock grew similarly to LIFZF’s over the last 12 months.

LIFZF's SMR Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLF (93) in the Steel industry. This means that LIFZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

CLF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Steel industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIFZF (76) in the null industry. This means that CLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than LIFZF’s over the last 12 months.

CLF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Steel industry is in the same range as LIFZF (22) in the null industry. This means that CLF’s stock grew similarly to LIFZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLFLIFZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LIFZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APDRX35.220.03
+0.09%
Artisan Global Opportunities Advisor
PWGAX20.09N/A
N/A
PACE International Equity A
WSEFX36.64N/A
N/A
Boston Trust Walden Equity
GQLIX34.10N/A
N/A
GMO Quality I
JETNX17.93N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Global Sust Eq N

CLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLF has been closely correlated with NUE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLF jumps, then NUE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLF
1D Price
Change %
CLF100%
+4.86%
NUE - CLF
75%
Closely correlated
+3.11%
STLD - CLF
73%
Closely correlated
+3.15%
CMC - CLF
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.72%
RS - CLF
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.60%
ZEUS - CLF
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.49%
More

LIFZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIFZF has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIFZF jumps, then MT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LIFZF
1D Price
Change %
LIFZF100%
-2.36%
MT - LIFZF
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
SID - LIFZF
33%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
TX - LIFZF
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
CLF - LIFZF
31%
Poorly correlated
+4.86%
MSB - LIFZF
29%
Poorly correlated
+3.49%
More