Ad is loading...
CLF
Price
$11.88
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
76 days until earnings call
SZGPY
Price
$1.77
Change
-$0.04 (-2.21%)
Updated
Nov 22 closing price
Ad is loading...

CLF vs SZGPY

Header iconCLF vs SZGPY Comparison
Open Charts CLF vs SZGPYBanner chart's image
Cleveland-Cliffs
Price$11.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.33M
CapitalizationN/A
Salzgitter AG
Price$1.77
Change-$0.04 (-2.21%)
Volume$600
CapitalizationN/A
CLF vs SZGPY Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLF vs. SZGPY commentary
Nov 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLF is a Hold and SZGPY is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 23, 2024
Stock price -- (CLF: $12.46 vs. SZGPY: $1.77)
Brand notoriety: CLF: Notable vs. SZGPY: Not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLF: 92% vs. SZGPY: 20%
Market capitalization -- CLF: $6.15B vs. SZGPY: $969.34M
CLF [@Steel] is valued at $6.15B. SZGPY’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $969.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $35.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $5.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSZGPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SZGPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SZGPY is a better buy in the long-term than CLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

CLF (@Steel) experienced а +12.86% price change this week, while SZGPY (@Steel) price change was -2.22% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLF is expected to report earnings on Feb 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+1.68% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLF($6.16B) has a higher market cap than SZGPY($969M). CLF has higher P/E ratio than SZGPY: CLF (145.67) vs SZGPY (42.91). CLF YTD gains are higher at: -38.981 vs. SZGPY (-42.832). CLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 745M vs. SZGPY (525M). SZGPY has more cash in the bank: 581M vs. CLF (39M). CLF has higher revenues than SZGPY: CLF (20B) vs SZGPY (10.2B).
CLFSZGPYCLF / SZGPY
Capitalization6.16B969M635%
EBITDA745M525M142%
Gain YTD-38.981-42.83291%
P/E Ratio145.6742.91339%
Revenue20B10.2B196%
Total Cash39M581M7%
Total Debt3.77BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLF vs SZGPY: Fundamental Ratings
CLF
SZGPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6396
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7396
SMR RATING
1..100
9188
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8149
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
32
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SZGPY's Valuation (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLF (90) in the Steel industry. This means that SZGPY’s stock grew significantly faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

CLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the Steel industry is in the same range as SZGPY (96) in the null industry. This means that CLF’s stock grew similarly to SZGPY’s over the last 12 months.

SZGPY's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as CLF (91) in the Steel industry. This means that SZGPY’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

SZGPY's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as CLF (81) in the Steel industry. This means that SZGPY’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

SZGPY's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as CLF (3) in the Steel industry. This means that SZGPY’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NIOAX13.500.14
+1.05%
Neuberger Berman Intl Small Cap A
FSIDX18.140.12
+0.67%
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc I
BIRDX8.370.05
+0.60%
iShares Developed Real Estate Idx Instl
DFMIX35.070.19
+0.54%
Davidson Multi-Cap Equity I
NBMVX53.14N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Adv

CLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLF has been closely correlated with NUE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLF jumps, then NUE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLF
1D Price
Change %
CLF100%
+4.88%
NUE - CLF
72%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
STLD - CLF
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
CMC - CLF
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
RS - CLF
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
RDUS - CLF
54%
Loosely correlated
+2.38%
More

SZGPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SZGPY has been loosely correlated with NUE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SZGPY jumps, then NUE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SZGPY
1D Price
Change %
SZGPY100%
-2.22%
NUE - SZGPY
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
CMC - SZGPY
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
MT - SZGPY
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
GGB - SZGPY
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLF - SZGPY
26%
Poorly correlated
+4.88%
More