CLF
Price
$6.96
Change
-$0.30 (-4.13%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
3.44B
12 days until earnings call
SZGPY
Price
$2.27
Change
-$0.20 (-8.10%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
1.31B
Ad is loading...

CLF vs SZGPY

Header iconCLF vs SZGPY Comparison
Open Charts CLF vs SZGPYBanner chart's image
Cleveland-Cliffs
Price$6.96
Change-$0.30 (-4.13%)
Volume$39.12M
Capitalization3.44B
Salzgitter AG
Price$2.27
Change-$0.20 (-8.10%)
Volume$298
Capitalization1.31B
CLF vs SZGPY Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLF vs. SZGPY commentary
Apr 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLF is a StrongBuy and SZGPY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CLF: $6.96 vs. SZGPY: $2.27)
Brand notoriety: CLF: Notable vs. SZGPY: Not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLF: 176% vs. SZGPY: 6%
Market capitalization -- CLF: $3.44B vs. SZGPY: $1.31B
CLF [@Steel] is valued at $3.44B. SZGPY’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $1.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $25.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $4.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSZGPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SZGPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SZGPY is a better buy in the long-term than CLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CLF (@Steel) experienced а -18.31% price change this week, while SZGPY (@Steel) price change was -8.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was -6.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLF is expected to report earnings on Jul 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (-6.77% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLF($3.44B) has a higher market cap than SZGPY($1.31B). CLF has higher P/E ratio than SZGPY: CLF (145.67) vs SZGPY (42.91). SZGPY YTD gains are higher at: 44.000 vs. CLF (-25.957). SZGPY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 462M vs. CLF (378M). SZGPY has more cash in the bank: 582M vs. CLF (54M). CLF has higher revenues than SZGPY: CLF (19.2B) vs SZGPY (10.1B).
CLFSZGPYCLF / SZGPY
Capitalization3.44B1.31B262%
EBITDA378M462M82%
Gain YTD-25.95744.000-59%
P/E Ratio145.6742.91339%
Revenue19.2B10.1B190%
Total Cash54M582M9%
Total Debt7.07BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLF vs SZGPY: Fundamental Ratings
CLF
SZGPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6750
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8666
SMR RATING
1..100
9190
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9242
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
22
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SZGPY's Valuation (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLF (89) in the Steel industry. This means that SZGPY’s stock grew significantly faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

SZGPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as CLF (86) in the Steel industry. This means that SZGPY’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

SZGPY's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as CLF (91) in the Steel industry. This means that SZGPY’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

SZGPY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLF (92) in the Steel industry. This means that SZGPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

SZGPY's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as CLF (2) in the Steel industry. This means that SZGPY’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HSGFX6.540.25
+3.97%
Hussman Strategic Market Cycle Fund
LVOTX16.98-0.85
-4.77%
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities R5
WPVAX25.08-1.39
-5.25%
abrdn International Small Cp R
LRMAX20.60-1.25
-5.72%
Lord Abbett Dividend Growth F3
RGAHX62.18-3.81
-5.77%
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E

CLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLF has been closely correlated with NUE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLF jumps, then NUE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLF
1D Price
Change %
CLF100%
-4.13%
NUE - CLF
75%
Closely correlated
-5.98%
STLD - CLF
70%
Closely correlated
-5.90%
CMC - CLF
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.61%
RS - CLF
61%
Loosely correlated
-3.83%
MTUS - CLF
54%
Loosely correlated
-5.93%
More