CLF
Price
$8.81
Change
+$0.05 (+0.57%)
Updated
Jul 3, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.33B
18 days until earnings call
SZGPY
Price
$2.37
Change
+$0.06 (+2.60%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.32B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLF vs SZGPY

Header iconCLF vs SZGPY Comparison
Open Charts CLF vs SZGPYBanner chart's image
Cleveland-Cliffs
Price$8.81
Change+$0.05 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization4.33B
Salzgitter AG
Price$2.37
Change+$0.06 (+2.60%)
Volume$151
Capitalization1.32B
CLF vs SZGPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SZGPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLF vs. SZGPY commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLF is a StrongBuy and SZGPY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CLF: $8.76 vs. SZGPY: $2.37)
Brand notoriety: CLF: Notable vs. SZGPY: Not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLF: 142% vs. SZGPY: 13%
Market capitalization -- CLF: $4.33B vs. SZGPY: $1.32B
CLF [@Steel] is valued at $4.33B. SZGPY’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $1.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $32.04B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $5.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSZGPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SZGPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SZGPY is a better buy in the long-term than CLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SZGPY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SZGPY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLF is a better buy in the short-term than SZGPY.

Price Growth

CLF (@Steel) experienced а +24.43% price change this week, while SZGPY (@Steel) price change was -0.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +2.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLF is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2025.

SZGPY is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+2.06% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLF($4.33B) has a higher market cap than SZGPY($1.32B). CLF has higher P/E ratio than SZGPY: CLF (145.67) vs SZGPY (42.91). SZGPY YTD gains are higher at: 52.006 vs. CLF (-6.809). SZGPY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 429M vs. CLF (-63M). SZGPY has more cash in the bank: 892M vs. CLF (57M). CLF has higher revenues than SZGPY: CLF (18.6B) vs SZGPY (9.66B).
CLFSZGPYCLF / SZGPY
Capitalization4.33B1.32B329%
EBITDA-63M429M-15%
Gain YTD-6.80952.006-13%
P/E Ratio145.6742.91339%
Revenue18.6B9.66B192%
Total Cash57M892M6%
Total Debt7.6BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLF vs SZGPY: Fundamental Ratings
CLF
SZGPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2227
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8971
SMR RATING
1..100
9393
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5051
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
22
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SZGPY's Valuation (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLF (89) in the Steel industry. This means that SZGPY’s stock grew significantly faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

SZGPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as CLF (89) in the Steel industry. This means that SZGPY’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

SZGPY's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as CLF (93) in the Steel industry. This means that SZGPY’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

CLF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Steel industry is in the same range as SZGPY (51) in the null industry. This means that CLF’s stock grew similarly to SZGPY’s over the last 12 months.

CLF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Steel industry is in the same range as SZGPY (2) in the null industry. This means that CLF’s stock grew similarly to SZGPY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLFSZGPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SZGPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STRAX33.23N/A
N/A
Sterling Capital Behav Lg Cp Val Eq R6
MIGCX54.36N/A
N/A
Invesco Main Street C
IARIX16.87N/A
N/A
Invesco Real Estate R5
TWQCX15.40N/A
N/A
Transamerica Large Cap Value C
TLOFX9.64N/A
N/A
Transamerica Large Value Opps R4

CLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLF has been closely correlated with NUE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLF jumps, then NUE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLF
1D Price
Change %
CLF100%
+7.88%
NUE - CLF
75%
Closely correlated
+3.54%
STLD - CLF
74%
Closely correlated
+3.00%
CMC - CLF
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.43%
RS - CLF
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
ZEUS - CLF
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.41%
More

SZGPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SZGPY has been loosely correlated with NUE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SZGPY jumps, then NUE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SZGPY
1D Price
Change %
SZGPY100%
+2.82%
NUE - SZGPY
34%
Loosely correlated
+3.54%
CMC - SZGPY
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.43%
MT - SZGPY
30%
Poorly correlated
+5.86%
GGB - SZGPY
27%
Poorly correlated
+4.45%
CLF - SZGPY
26%
Poorly correlated
+7.88%
More