Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLGPX vs GFACX
CLGPX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts CLGPX vs GFACX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opp R
Price$17.92
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$73.45
Change+$0.17 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
CLGPX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLGPX vs. GFACX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLGPX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. CLGPX (1.3B). CLGPX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . CLGPX was incepted earlier than GFACX: CLGPX (9 years) vs GFACX (25 years). CLGPX (1.36) and GFACX (1.36) have similar cost to investors . CLGPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). CLGPX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: CLGPX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX (16.14) and CLGPX (15.91) have marching annual gain over last year. GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.72 vs. CLGPX (-18.69).
| CLGPX | GFACX | CLGPX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.36 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.36 | 100% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.474 | 15.198 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.3B | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.91 | 16.14 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.57 | 53.18 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | -18.69 | 32.72 | -57% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 79.85 | - |