CLKXF
Price
$14.78
Change
+$0.71 (+5.05%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
305.7M
FOCIF
Price
$2.50
Change
-$0.60 (-19.35%)
Updated
May 7 closing price
Capitalization
433.79M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLKXF vs FOCIF

Header iconCLKXF vs FOCIF Comparison
Open Charts CLKXF vs FOCIFBanner chart's image
TWC Enterprises
Price$14.78
Change+$0.71 (+5.05%)
Volume$100
Capitalization305.7M
Focusrite
Price$2.50
Change-$0.60 (-19.35%)
Volume$100
Capitalization433.79M
CLKXF vs FOCIF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLKXF vs. FOCIF commentary
Jun 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLKXF is a Hold and FOCIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 08, 2025
Stock price -- (CLKXF: $14.78 vs. FOCIF: $2.50)
Brand notoriety: CLKXF and FOCIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLKXF: 53% vs. FOCIF: 66%
Market capitalization -- CLKXF: $305.7M vs. FOCIF: $433.79M
CLKXF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $305.7M. FOCIF’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $433.79M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLKXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFOCIF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CLKXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FOCIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLKXF is a better buy in the long-term than FOCIF.

Price Growth

CLKXF (@Recreational Products) experienced а +10.30% price change this week, while FOCIF (@Recreational Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +2.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.50%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+2.73% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FOCIF($434M) has a higher market cap than CLKXF($306M). CLKXF has higher P/E ratio than FOCIF: CLKXF (19.42) vs FOCIF (13.32). CLKXF YTD gains are higher at: 15.740 vs. FOCIF (-31.880). CLKXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 139M vs. FOCIF (36.4M). CLKXF has more cash in the bank: 117M vs. FOCIF (13.5M). FOCIF has less debt than CLKXF: FOCIF (26.8M) vs CLKXF (105M). CLKXF has higher revenues than FOCIF: CLKXF (221M) vs FOCIF (177M).
CLKXFFOCIFCLKXF / FOCIF
Capitalization306M434M71%
EBITDA139M36.4M382%
Gain YTD15.740-31.880-49%
P/E Ratio19.4213.32146%
Revenue221M177M125%
Total Cash117M13.5M867%
Total Debt105M26.8M392%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLKXF vs FOCIF: Fundamental Ratings
CLKXF
FOCIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4325
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57100
SMR RATING
1..100
7790
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4290
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
774
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FOCIF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as CLKXF (38). This means that FOCIF’s stock grew similarly to CLKXF’s over the last 12 months.

CLKXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOCIF (100). This means that CLKXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOCIF’s over the last 12 months.

CLKXF's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as FOCIF (90). This means that CLKXF’s stock grew similarly to FOCIF’s over the last 12 months.

CLKXF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOCIF (90). This means that CLKXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOCIF’s over the last 12 months.

FOCIF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLKXF (77). This means that FOCIF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLKXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CTS41.860.45
+1.09%
CTS Corp
KDP32.770.21
+0.64%
Keurig Dr Pepper
RYN23.460.03
+0.13%
Rayonier
LX7.31-0.15
-2.01%
LexinFintech Holdings Ltd
LYRA24.28-1.05
-4.15%
Lyra Therapeutics Inc

CLKXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLKXF and YETI have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLKXF and YETI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLKXF
1D Price
Change %
CLKXF100%
N/A
YETI - CLKXF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
KENS - CLKXF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GYYMF - CLKXF
4%
Poorly correlated
+4.71%
GMWKF - CLKXF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
CUKPF - CLKXF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FOCIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FOCIF and GMWKF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FOCIF and GMWKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOCIF
1D Price
Change %
FOCIF100%
N/A
GMWKF - FOCIF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
GYYMF - FOCIF
2%
Poorly correlated
+4.71%
CUKPF - FOCIF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANPDF - FOCIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLKXF - FOCIF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More