CLKXF
Price
$16.08
Change
-$1.25 (-7.21%)
Updated
Jul 30 closing price
Capitalization
414.57M
GBBYF
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
308.18M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLKXF vs GBBYF

Header iconCLKXF vs GBBYF Comparison
Open Charts CLKXF vs GBBYFBanner chart's image
TWC Enterprises
Price$16.08
Change-$1.25 (-7.21%)
Volume$100
Capitalization414.57M
Goodbaby International Holdings
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization308.18M
CLKXF vs GBBYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLKXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLKXF vs. GBBYF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLKXF is a Hold and GBBYF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (CLKXF: $16.08 vs. GBBYF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: CLKXF and GBBYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLKXF: 92% vs. GBBYF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CLKXF: $414.57M vs. GBBYF: $308.18M
CLKXF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $414.57M. GBBYF’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $308.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $39.69B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $4.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLKXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGBBYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLKXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GBBYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLKXF is a better buy in the long-term than GBBYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLKXF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CLKXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

CLKXF (@Recreational Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GBBYF (@Recreational Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.98%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (-1.63% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLKXF($415M) has a higher market cap than GBBYF($308M). CLKXF has higher P/E ratio than GBBYF: CLKXF (8.93) vs GBBYF (6.35). GBBYF YTD gains are higher at: 69.492 vs. CLKXF (25.920).
CLKXFGBBYFCLKXF / GBBYF
Capitalization415M308M135%
EBITDA92.3MN/A-
Gain YTD25.92069.49237%
P/E Ratio8.936.35141%
Revenue221MN/A-
Total Cash161MN/A-
Total Debt24.1MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLKXF vs GBBYF: Fundamental Ratings
CLKXF
GBBYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3329
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4075
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4739
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GBBYF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is in the same range as CLKXF (30). This means that GBBYF’s stock grew similarly to CLKXF’s over the last 12 months.

CLKXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GBBYF (75). This means that CLKXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GBBYF’s over the last 12 months.

CLKXF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as GBBYF (100). This means that CLKXF’s stock grew similarly to GBBYF’s over the last 12 months.

GBBYF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as CLKXF (47). This means that GBBYF’s stock grew similarly to CLKXF’s over the last 12 months.

GBBYF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CLKXF (100). This means that GBBYF’s stock grew similarly to CLKXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLKXFGBBYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
24%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
22%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLKXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WPVLX33.90N/A
N/A
Weitz Multi Cap Equity-Investor Cl
CIPSX21.94N/A
N/A
Champlain Small Company Adv
MSEPX23.26N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Emerging Mkts C
VGINX90.17N/A
N/A
JPMorgan US Value R6
NEQCX12.53N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman U.S. Equity Impact C

CLKXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLKXF and YETI have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLKXF and YETI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLKXF
1D Price
Change %
CLKXF100%
N/A
YETI - CLKXF
23%
Poorly correlated
-3.68%
KENS - CLKXF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GYYMF - CLKXF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMWKF - CLKXF
3%
Poorly correlated
+5.41%
CUKPF - CLKXF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GBBYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GBBYF and THLPF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GBBYF and THLPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBBYF
1D Price
Change %
GBBYF100%
N/A
THLPF - GBBYF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TOMYY - GBBYF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUKPF - GBBYF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLKXF - GBBYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GYYMF - GBBYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More