CLKXF
Price
$16.08
Change
-$1.25 (-7.21%)
Updated
Jul 30 closing price
Capitalization
413.8M
GMWKF
Price
$210.60
Change
-$7.17 (-3.29%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
6.92B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLKXF vs GMWKF

Header iconCLKXF vs GMWKF Comparison
Open Charts CLKXF vs GMWKFBanner chart's image
TWC Enterprises
Price$16.08
Change-$1.25 (-7.21%)
Volume$100
Capitalization413.8M
Games Workshop Group
Price$210.60
Change-$7.17 (-3.29%)
Volume$38
Capitalization6.92B
CLKXF vs GMWKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLKXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMWKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLKXF vs. GMWKF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLKXF is a Buy and GMWKF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (CLKXF: $16.08 vs. GMWKF: $210.60)
Brand notoriety: CLKXF and GMWKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLKXF: 90% vs. GMWKF: 22%
Market capitalization -- CLKXF: $413.8M vs. GMWKF: $6.92B
CLKXF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $413.8M. GMWKF’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $6.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $38.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLKXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGMWKF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • CLKXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GMWKF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, GMWKF is a better buy in the long-term than CLKXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLKXF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GMWKF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLKXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • GMWKF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GMWKF is a better buy in the short-term than CLKXF.

Price Growth

CLKXF (@Recreational Products) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GMWKF (@Recreational Products) price change was -2.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +28.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +21.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.43%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (+28.43% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMWKF($6.92B) has a higher market cap than CLKXF($414M). GMWKF has higher P/E ratio than CLKXF: GMWKF (26.38) vs CLKXF (8.95). CLKXF YTD gains are higher at: 25.920 vs. GMWKF (18.315). GMWKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 308M vs. CLKXF (92.3M). CLKXF has more cash in the bank: 161M vs. GMWKF (133M). CLKXF has less debt than GMWKF: CLKXF (24.1M) vs GMWKF (45.2M). GMWKF has higher revenues than CLKXF: GMWKF (618M) vs CLKXF (221M).
CLKXFGMWKFCLKXF / GMWKF
Capitalization414M6.92B6%
EBITDA92.3M308M30%
Gain YTD25.92018.315142%
P/E Ratio8.9526.3834%
Revenue221M618M36%
Total Cash161M133M121%
Total Debt24.1M45.2M53%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLKXF vs GMWKF: Fundamental Ratings
CLKXF
GMWKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3377
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4050
SMR RATING
1..100
6815
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4745
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9332
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GMWKF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as CLKXF (31). This means that GMWKF’s stock grew similarly to CLKXF’s over the last 12 months.

CLKXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as GMWKF (50). This means that CLKXF’s stock grew similarly to GMWKF’s over the last 12 months.

GMWKF's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLKXF (68). This means that GMWKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLKXF’s over the last 12 months.

GMWKF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as CLKXF (47). This means that GMWKF’s stock grew similarly to CLKXF’s over the last 12 months.

GMWKF's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLKXF (93). This means that GMWKF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLKXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLKXFGMWKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLKXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GMWKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPXN69.580.21
+0.30%
ProShares S&P 500® ex-Financials
JSTC20.200.03
+0.15%
Adasina Social Justice All Cp Glbl ETF
TDVG43.310.05
+0.12%
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF
FEGE42.230.04
+0.09%
FIRST EAGLE GLOBAL EQUITY ETF
EMTY11.37-0.10
-0.86%
ProShares Decline of the Retl Store ETF

CLKXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLKXF and YETI have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLKXF and YETI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLKXF
1D Price
Change %
CLKXF100%
N/A
YETI - CLKXF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
KENS - CLKXF
8%
Poorly correlated
-24.32%
GYYMF - CLKXF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMWKF - CLKXF
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.29%
CUKPF - CLKXF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GMWKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GMWKF and GYYMF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMWKF and GYYMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMWKF
1D Price
Change %
GMWKF100%
-3.29%
GYYMF - GMWKF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FOCIF - GMWKF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLKXF - GMWKF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KENS - GMWKF
-2%
Poorly correlated
-24.32%
ANPDF - GMWKF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More