CLLKF
Price
$2.56
Change
-$0.28 (-9.86%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
167.7M
LFTSF
Price
$0.23
Change
+$0.04 (+21.05%)
Updated
Feb 8 closing price
Capitalization
1.12B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLLKF vs LFTSF

Header iconCLLKF vs LFTSF Comparison
Open Charts CLLKF vs LFTSFBanner chart's image
BICO GROUP AB
Price$2.56
Change-$0.28 (-9.86%)
Volume$350
Capitalization167.7M
LIFETECH SCIENTIFIC
Price$0.23
Change+$0.04 (+21.05%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.12B
CLLKF vs LFTSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLLKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLLKF vs. LFTSF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLLKF is a Hold and LFTSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CLLKF: $2.56 vs. LFTSF: $0.23)
Brand notoriety: CLLKF and LFTSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLLKF: 22% vs. LFTSF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CLLKF: $167.7M vs. LFTSF: $1.12B
CLLKF [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $167.7M. LFTSF’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $1.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $231.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLLKF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLFTSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CLLKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LFTSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LFTSF is a better buy in the long-term than CLLKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLLKF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CLLKF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CLLKF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LFTSF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (-0.21% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LFTSF($1.12B) has a higher market cap than CLLKF($168M). LFTSF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. CLLKF (-8.750). LFTSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 253M vs. CLLKF (-54.8M). CLLKF has higher revenues than LFTSF: CLLKF (1.87B) vs LFTSF (1.27B).
CLLKFLFTSFCLLKF / LFTSF
Capitalization168M1.12B15%
EBITDA-54.8M253M-22%
Gain YTD-8.7500.000-
P/E RatioN/A28.06-
Revenue1.87B1.27B147%
Total Cash596MN/A-
Total Debt1.41BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLLKF: Fundamental Ratings
CLLKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
86
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
93
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
86
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLLKFLFTSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
1%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLLKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SEPIX13.43N/A
N/A
Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials I
NMIAX29.28N/A
N/A
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core A
UVALX20.20N/A
N/A
Victory Value
AZNCX9.80N/A
N/A
Virtus Income & Growth C
WBCRX16.77N/A
N/A
William Blair Small-Mid Cap Core R6

CLLKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLLKF and LFTSF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLLKF and LFTSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLLKF
1D Price
Change %
CLLKF100%
N/A
LFTSF - CLLKF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRCT - CLLKF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
VTAK - CLLKF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TPGVF - CLLKF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MOVE - CLLKF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.86%
More

LFTSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LFTSF has been loosely correlated with CLLKF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LFTSF jumps, then CLLKF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LFTSF
1D Price
Change %
LFTSF100%
N/A
CLLKF - LFTSF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TPGVF - LFTSF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MYNZ - LFTSF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
BCCOY - LFTSF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RBOT - LFTSF
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.23%
More