CLLKF
Price
$2.56
Change
-$0.28 (-9.86%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
167.7M
TPGVF
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
1.16B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLLKF vs TPGVF

Header iconCLLKF vs TPGVF Comparison
Open Charts CLLKF vs TPGVFBanner chart's image
BICO GROUP AB
Price$2.56
Change-$0.28 (-9.86%)
Volume$350
Capitalization167.7M
Top Glove
Price$0.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$13K
Capitalization1.16B
CLLKF vs TPGVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLLKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TPGVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLLKF vs. TPGVF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLLKF is a Hold and TPGVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CLLKF: $2.56 vs. TPGVF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: CLLKF and TPGVF are both not notable
CLLKF represents the Medical/Nursing Services, while TPGVF is part of the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLLKF: 22% vs. TPGVF: 135%
Market capitalization -- CLLKF: $167.7M vs. TPGVF: $1.16B
CLLKF [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $167.7M. TPGVF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $1.16B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $231.38B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $162.93B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $5.65B. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $10.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLLKF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTPGVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLLKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TPGVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TPGVF is a better buy in the long-term than CLLKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLLKF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TPGVF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLLKF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TPGVF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TPGVF is a better buy in the short-term than CLLKF.

Price Growth

CLLKF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TPGVF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.02%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.51%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (-0.21% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-1.39% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TPGVF($1.16B) has a higher market cap than CLLKF($168M). CLLKF YTD gains are higher at: -8.750 vs. TPGVF (-47.384). TPGVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 426M vs. CLLKF (-54.8M). CLLKF has more cash in the bank: 596M vs. TPGVF (528M). TPGVF has less debt than CLLKF: TPGVF (1.01B) vs CLLKF (1.41B). TPGVF has higher revenues than CLLKF: TPGVF (3.43B) vs CLLKF (1.87B).
CLLKFTPGVFCLLKF / TPGVF
Capitalization168M1.16B15%
EBITDA-54.8M426M-13%
Gain YTD-8.750-47.38418%
P/E RatioN/A86.13-
Revenue1.87B3.43B54%
Total Cash596M528M113%
Total Debt1.41B1.01B139%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLLKF vs TPGVF: Fundamental Ratings
CLLKF
TPGVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8645
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9491
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9379
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8660
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TPGVF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLLKF (88). This means that TPGVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLLKF’s over the last 12 months.

TPGVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CLLKF (100). This means that TPGVF’s stock grew similarly to CLLKF’s over the last 12 months.

TPGVF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as CLLKF (94). This means that TPGVF’s stock grew similarly to CLLKF’s over the last 12 months.

TPGVF's Price Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as CLLKF (93). This means that TPGVF’s stock grew similarly to CLLKF’s over the last 12 months.

TPGVF's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as CLLKF (86). This means that TPGVF’s stock grew similarly to CLLKF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLLKFTPGVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLLKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TPGVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SEPIX13.43N/A
N/A
Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials I
NMIAX29.28N/A
N/A
Columbia Large Cap Enhanced Core A
UVALX20.20N/A
N/A
Victory Value
AZNCX9.80N/A
N/A
Virtus Income & Growth C
WBCRX16.77N/A
N/A
William Blair Small-Mid Cap Core R6

CLLKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLLKF and LFTSF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLLKF and LFTSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLLKF
1D Price
Change %
CLLKF100%
N/A
LFTSF - CLLKF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PRCT - CLLKF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
VTAK - CLLKF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TPGVF - CLLKF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MOVE - CLLKF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.86%
More

TPGVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TPGVF and VVOS have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TPGVF and VVOS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TPGVF
1D Price
Change %
TPGVF100%
N/A
VVOS - TPGVF
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.87%
BCCOY - TPGVF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LFTSF - TPGVF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JMPHF - TPGVF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLLKF - TPGVF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More