CLLNY
Price
$17.78
Change
+$0.22 (+1.25%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
24.35B
82 days until earnings call
GRGTF
Price
$2.63
Change
-$0.14 (-5.07%)
Updated
Aug 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.04B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLLNY vs GRGTF

Header iconCLLNY vs GRGTF Comparison
Open Charts CLLNY vs GRGTFBanner chart's image
Cellnex Telecom SA
Price$17.78
Change+$0.22 (+1.25%)
Volume$46.2K
Capitalization24.35B
Grainger
Price$2.63
Change-$0.14 (-5.07%)
Volume$331
Capitalization2.04B
CLLNY vs GRGTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLLNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRGTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLLNY vs. GRGTF commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLLNY is a Hold and GRGTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (CLLNY: $17.78 vs. GRGTF: $2.63)
Brand notoriety: CLLNY and GRGTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLLNY: 72% vs. GRGTF: 53%
Market capitalization -- CLLNY: $24.35B vs. GRGTF: $2.04B
CLLNY [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $24.35B. GRGTF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $2.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $4.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLLNY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGRGTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLLNY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GRGTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GRGTF is a better buy in the long-term than CLLNY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLLNY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GRGTF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLLNY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GRGTF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GRGTF is a better buy in the short-term than CLLNY.

Price Growth

CLLNY (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +1.68% price change this week, while GRGTF (@Real Estate Development) price change was -4.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +3.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLLNY is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+3.25% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLLNY($24.3B) has a higher market cap than GRGTF($2.04B). CLLNY has higher P/E ratio than GRGTF: CLLNY (79.92) vs GRGTF (13.15). CLLNY YTD gains are higher at: 14.134 vs. GRGTF (-10.410). CLLNY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.15B vs. GRGTF (189M). CLLNY has more cash in the bank: 1.46B vs. GRGTF (74.9M). GRGTF has less debt than CLLNY: GRGTF (1.57B) vs CLLNY (21.9B). CLLNY has higher revenues than GRGTF: CLLNY (4.09B) vs GRGTF (306M).
CLLNYGRGTFCLLNY / GRGTF
Capitalization24.3B2.04B1,191%
EBITDA3.15B189M1,665%
Gain YTD14.134-10.410-136%
P/E Ratio79.9213.15608%
Revenue4.09B306M1,337%
Total Cash1.46B74.9M1,949%
Total Debt21.9B1.57B1,395%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLLNY: Fundamental Ratings
CLLNY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLLNYGRGTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
70%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLLNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GRGTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AHSZX19.640.18
+0.92%
Alger Health Sciences Z
HFYRX12.980.05
+0.39%
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val R3
NSVAX14.09-0.08
-0.56%
Columbia Small Cap Value II Inst
MVCCX29.12-0.18
-0.61%
MFS Mid Cap Value C
RYOTX11.52-0.13
-1.12%
Royce Micro-Cap Invmt

GRGTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRGTF and SURDF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRGTF and SURDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRGTF
1D Price
Change %
GRGTF100%
N/A
SURDF - GRGTF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLLNY - GRGTF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
SWPFF - GRGTF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VNNVF - GRGTF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.32%
VGPBF - GRGTF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More