CLLXF
Price
$0.52
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
35.08M
CMCLF
Price
$1.10
Change
-$0.02 (-1.79%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
17.95B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLLXF vs CMCLF

Header iconCLLXF vs CMCLF Comparison
Open Charts CLLXF vs CMCLFBanner chart's image
Callinex Mines
Price$0.52
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.94K
Capitalization35.08M
CMOC GROUP
Price$1.10
Change-$0.02 (-1.79%)
Volume$2.4K
Capitalization17.95B
CLLXF vs CMCLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CLLXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMCLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLLXF vs. CMCLF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLLXF is a StrongBuy and CMCLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CLLXF: $0.52 vs. CMCLF: $1.10)
Brand notoriety: CLLXF and CMCLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLLXF: 31% vs. CMCLF: 24%
Market capitalization -- CLLXF: $35.08M vs. CMCLF: $17.95B
CLLXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $35.08M. CMCLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $17.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLLXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCMCLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLLXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CMCLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMCLF is a better buy in the long-term than CLLXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLLXF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMCLF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLLXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CMCLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CLLXF and CMCLF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CLLXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +9.79% price change this week, while CMCLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +5.77% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMCLF($17.9B) has a higher market cap than CLLXF($35.1M). CLLXF has higher P/E ratio than CMCLF: CLLXF (1111.11) vs CMCLF (22.22). CMCLF YTD gains are higher at: 73.996 vs. CLLXF (-13.720). CMCLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.3B vs. CLLXF (337K). CMCLF has more cash in the bank: 38.7B vs. CLLXF (6.71M). CLLXF has less debt than CMCLF: CLLXF (74.7K) vs CMCLF (46.7B). CMCLF has higher revenues than CLLXF: CMCLF (173B) vs CLLXF (0).
CLLXFCMCLFCLLXF / CMCLF
Capitalization35.1M17.9B0%
EBITDA337K10.3B0%
Gain YTD-13.72073.996-19%
P/E Ratio1111.1122.225,000%
Revenue0173B-
Total Cash6.71M38.7B0%
Total Debt74.7K46.7B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLLXF vs CMCLF: Fundamental Ratings
CLLXF
CMCLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6532
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10034
SMR RATING
1..100
9041
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8238
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1757
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMCLF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLLXF (98). This means that CMCLF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLLXF’s over the last 12 months.

CMCLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLLXF (100). This means that CMCLF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLLXF’s over the last 12 months.

CMCLF's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLLXF (90). This means that CMCLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLLXF’s over the last 12 months.

CMCLF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLLXF (82). This means that CMCLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLLXF’s over the last 12 months.

CLLXF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMCLF (57). This means that CLLXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMCLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLLXFCMCLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLLXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMCLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SKYU35.220.23
+0.66%
ProShares Ultra Cloud Computing
IWF439.882.03
+0.46%
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
BOCT46.440.13
+0.29%
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ Oct
BSTP35.210.08
+0.23%
Innovator Buffer Step-Up Strategy ETF
SMMU50.19-0.01
-0.02%
PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Actv ETF

CLLXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLLXF and GSM have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLLXF and GSM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLLXF
1D Price
Change %
CLLXF100%
+1.28%
GSM - CLLXF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
TECK - CLLXF
26%
Poorly correlated
-6.04%
SOUHY - CLLXF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.36%
ERO - CLLXF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.75%
SCCO - CLLXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
More

CMCLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMCLF and CNIKF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMCLF and CNIKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMCLF
1D Price
Change %
CMCLF100%
-2.22%
CNIKF - CMCLF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
CLLXF - CMCLF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
CRECF - CMCLF
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.47%
CPPMF - CMCLF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
CSRNF - CMCLF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More