CLLXF
Price
$0.53
Change
-$0.02 (-3.64%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
35.08M
CMCLF
Price
$1.02
Change
+$0.10 (+10.87%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
17.95B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLLXF vs CMCLF

Header iconCLLXF vs CMCLF Comparison
Open Charts CLLXF vs CMCLFBanner chart's image
Callinex Mines
Price$0.53
Change-$0.02 (-3.64%)
Volume$359
Capitalization35.08M
CMOC GROUP
Price$1.02
Change+$0.10 (+10.87%)
Volume$4K
Capitalization17.95B
CLLXF vs CMCLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLLXF vs. CMCLF commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLLXF is a Hold and CMCLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (CLLXF: $0.53 vs. CMCLF: $1.00)
Brand notoriety: CLLXF and CMCLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLLXF: 6% vs. CMCLF: 57%
Market capitalization -- CLLXF: $35.08M vs. CMCLF: $17.95B
CLLXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $35.08M. CMCLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $17.95B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.07B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLLXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCMCLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLLXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CMCLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CMCLF is a better buy in the long-term than CLLXF.

Price Growth

CLLXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.90% price change this week, while CMCLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +15.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.75%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.02% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMCLF($17.9B) has a higher market cap than CLLXF($35.1M). CLLXF has higher P/E ratio than CMCLF: CLLXF (1111.11) vs CMCLF (22.22). CMCLF YTD gains are higher at: 58.178 vs. CLLXF (-12.385). CMCLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 10.3B vs. CLLXF (337K). CMCLF has more cash in the bank: 38.7B vs. CLLXF (6.71M). CLLXF has less debt than CMCLF: CLLXF (74.7K) vs CMCLF (46.7B). CMCLF has higher revenues than CLLXF: CMCLF (173B) vs CLLXF (0).
CLLXFCMCLFCLLXF / CMCLF
Capitalization35.1M17.9B0%
EBITDA337K10.3B0%
Gain YTD-12.38558.178-21%
P/E Ratio1111.1122.225,000%
Revenue0173B-
Total Cash6.71M38.7B0%
Total Debt74.7K46.7B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLLXF vs CMCLF: Fundamental Ratings
CLLXF
CMCLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
950
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9436
SMR RATING
1..100
9041
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8339
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1688
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMCLF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLLXF (98). This means that CMCLF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLLXF’s over the last 12 months.

CMCLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLLXF (94). This means that CMCLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLLXF’s over the last 12 months.

CMCLF's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLLXF (90). This means that CMCLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLLXF’s over the last 12 months.

CMCLF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLLXF (83). This means that CMCLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLLXF’s over the last 12 months.

CLLXF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CMCLF (88). This means that CLLXF’s stock grew significantly faster than CMCLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JNRFX91.910.75
+0.82%
Janus Henderson Research D
LCGJX30.830.22
+0.72%
William Blair Large Cap Growth R6
VRESX17.310.07
+0.41%
Virtus KAR Emerging Markets Small-Cap R6
VEVFX41.780.16
+0.38%
Vanguard Explorer Value Inv
AISZX16.83-0.02
-0.12%
Alger SmallCap Growth Institutional Z-2

CLLXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CLLXF and GSM have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CLLXF and GSM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLLXF
1D Price
Change %
CLLXF100%
-3.40%
GSM - CLLXF
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.17%
TECK - CLLXF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.29%
SOUHY - CLLXF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
ERO - CLLXF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.78%
SCCO - CLLXF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.04%
More

CMCLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMCLF and CMDRF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMCLF and CMDRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMCLF
1D Price
Change %
CMCLF100%
+9.08%
CMDRF - CMCLF
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNIKF - CMCLF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.07%
CLLXF - CMCLF
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.40%
CRECF - CMCLF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
CPPMF - CMCLF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+2.48%
More